Time and the Problem of Royal Succession in Shakespeare's History Plays

Shakespeare's most innovative genre was the history play, because it has no precedent in either classical or medieval tradition. In contrast to the focused teleology of Christian medieval drama, Shakespeare's history plays manifest an implicit idea of history that was secular, political, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Review of Politics. - Cambridge University Press. - 78(2016), 4, Seite 609-624
1. Verfasser: Cox, John D. (VerfasserIn)
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2016
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:The Review of Politics
Schlagworte:Arts Political science Law Behavioral sciences
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Shakespeare's most innovative genre was the history play, because it has no precedent in either classical or medieval tradition. In contrast to the focused teleology of Christian medieval drama, Shakespeare's history plays manifest an implicit idea of history that was secular, political, and open-ended. They emphasize human action in a political arena, where the criterion for success is the ability to act in time, without regard to one's spiritual state. Time determines royal succession, which is the focus of all Shakespeare's history plays, as it was the focus of political concern in England in the 1590s, when the plays were written. His emphasis on time and royal succession distinguishes his implied political theory from the moralism and authoritarianism of official Tudor state doctrine on one hand and from the pragmatism of Machiavelli on the other.
ISSN:17486858