Clitic doubling and language contact in Arabic

Forms of clitic doubling are attested in a significant number of Arabic varieties, including the Levant and northern Iraq, parts of Algeria and Morocco, Malta, Central Asia, and even, doubtfully, Dhofar. Language contact is widely accepted as an explanation for its presence in the Levant, and has be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft. - Kommissionsverlag Franz Steiner Wiesbaden GmbH, 1847. - (2017), 66, Seite 45-70
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Veröffentlicht: 2017
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft
Schlagworte:Behavioral sciences Linguistics
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST133554058
003 DE-627
005 20240625163443.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230311s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||en c
024 7 |a 10.13173/zeitarabling.66.0045  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)JST133554058 
035 |a (JST)zeitarabling.66.0045 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a en 
245 1 0 |a Clitic doubling and language contact in Arabic 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Forms of clitic doubling are attested in a significant number of Arabic varieties, including the Levant and northern Iraq, parts of Algeria and Morocco, Malta, Central Asia, and even, doubtfully, Dhofar. Language contact is widely accepted as an explanation for its presence in the Levant, and has been advanced as an explanation for its occurrence in North Africa, Malta, and Central Asia. However, none of the contact explanations proposed have yet addressed this phenomenon's overall distribution across all of Arabic, usually limiting themselves to one or two regions at a time, and few have examined the parameters along which the relevant constructions vary. Without such an overview, it is not possible to exclude the hypothesis that clitic doubling simply reflects Arabic-internal trends, nor to determine whether its distribution reflects a single innovation or multiple independent ones. Updating the pioneering work of A. FISCHER (1907; 1909), this article demonstrates that clitic doubling has arisen independently within Arabic at least four times under the influence of different substrata/adstrata, and suggests areas in which more data on this construction would be especially useful. 
540 |a © 2017 Otto Harrassowitz GmbH & Co. KG 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Applied anthropology  |x Linguistic anthropology  |x Language contact 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Linguistic analysis  |x Linguistic strata  |x Linguistic substrata 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Grammar  |x Grammatical constructions 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Ethnology  |x Ethnolinguistics  |x Dialectology  |x Dialects  |x Regional dialects 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Grammar  |x Parts of speech  |x Adpositions  |x Prepositions 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Language 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Ethnology  |x Ethnolinguistics  |x Dialectology  |x Dialects 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Grammar  |x Syntax 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Sociology  |x Human societies  |x Social institutions  |x Families  |x Kinship 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Applied anthropology  |x Linguistic anthropology  |x Language contact 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Linguistic analysis  |x Linguistic strata  |x Linguistic substrata 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Grammar  |x Grammatical constructions 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Ethnology  |x Ethnolinguistics  |x Dialectology  |x Dialects  |x Regional dialects 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Grammar  |x Parts of speech  |x Adpositions  |x Prepositions 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Language 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Ethnology  |x Ethnolinguistics  |x Dialectology  |x Dialects 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Grammar  |x Syntax 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Sociology  |x Human societies  |x Social institutions  |x Families  |x Kinship  |x Aufsätze 
655 4 |a research-article 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft  |d Kommissionsverlag Franz Steiner Wiesbaden GmbH, 1847  |g (2017), 66, Seite 45-70  |w (DE-627)606449701  |w (DE-600)2509686-2  |x 03410137  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g year:2017  |g number:66  |g pages:45-70 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13173/zeitarabling.66.0045  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.13173/zeitarabling.66.0045  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_23 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_73 
912 |a GBV_ILN_74 
912 |a GBV_ILN_95 
912 |a GBV_ILN_105 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_151 
912 |a GBV_ILN_161 
912 |a GBV_ILN_213 
912 |a GBV_ILN_230 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_293 
912 |a GBV_ILN_370 
912 |a GBV_ILN_602 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2093 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4326 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4338 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4367 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4392 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |j 2017  |e 66  |h 45-70