'OLD' BRITISH VERSUS 'OLD' GERMAN ANTHROPOLOGY: The Kond case in Odisha (India)

A monograph by Frederick G. Bailey, written in the Manchester tradition, is compared with a book by Hermann Niggemeyer, a member of the Frankfurt school of cultural morphology, in order to select what is theoretically or ethnographically valuable from these two very different approaches and their ti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Paideuma. - Bamberger Verlagshaus Meisenbach & Co.. - 62(2016) vom: Jan., Seite 91-111
1. Verfasser: Pfeffer, Georg (VerfasserIn)
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2016
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Paideuma
Schlagworte:Behavioral sciences Religion Physical sciences
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST133346056
003 DE-627
005 20240625162105.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221103s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)JST133346056 
035 |a (JST)44243088 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Pfeffer, Georg  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a 'OLD' BRITISH VERSUS 'OLD' GERMAN ANTHROPOLOGY: The Kond case in Odisha (India) 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a A monograph by Frederick G. Bailey, written in the Manchester tradition, is compared with a book by Hermann Niggemeyer, a member of the Frankfurt school of cultural morphology, in order to select what is theoretically or ethnographically valuable from these two very different approaches and their time-bound fashions and limitations. Both works deal with the tribal Kond of eastern India, and both result from fieldwork conducted in 1955/56. Bailey offers an intricate theoretical scheme, though he confines his attention to the study of the political sub-structure and mostly avoids subjects like myth, ritual and kinship, whereas Niggemeyer tries to avoid any kind of theory whatsoever. He excels in the description of myths and technology, though his 'culture historical' speculations have little value to today's anthropology. Bailey's treatment of Kond society conceives it as a social whole, rather than presenting miscellaneous traits in the manner of his German colleague, who, as his unique contribution, is nonetheless able to offer invaluable data. The aim of the comparison is to point out the anthropological weight of these two mutually exclusive approaches in the light of later research efforts. 
540 |a © 2016 FROBENIUS-INSTITUT E.V. 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Sociology  |x Human societies  |x Social structures  |x Clans 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Ethnology  |x Ethnic groups  |x Ethnoreligious groups  |x Hindus 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Applied anthropology  |x Cultural anthropology  |x Political anthropology 
650 4 |a Religion  |x Theology  |x Practical theology  |x Religious practices  |x Religious rituals 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Applied anthropology  |x Cultural anthropology 
650 4 |a Religion  |x Theology  |x Practical theology  |x Religious practices  |x Religious rituals  |x Religious sacrifices  |x Sacrifices 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Ethnology  |x Ethnography 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Sociology  |x Human societies  |x Social institutions  |x Families  |x Kinship 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Applied anthropology  |x Cultural anthropology  |x Cultural customs  |x Rituals 
650 4 |a Physical sciences  |x Earth sciences  |x Geography  |x Geomorphology  |x Topography  |x Lowlands 
655 4 |a research-article 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Paideuma  |d Bamberger Verlagshaus Meisenbach & Co.  |g 62(2016) vom: Jan., Seite 91-111  |w (DE-627)675857538  |w (DE-600)2639312-8  |x 00787809  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:62  |g year:2016  |g month:01  |g pages:91-111 
856 4 0 |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/44243088  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_23 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_73 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_95 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_151 
912 |a GBV_ILN_161 
912 |a GBV_ILN_213 
912 |a GBV_ILN_230 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_293 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_602 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2034 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2147 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2148 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2950 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4326 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4367 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 62  |j 2016  |c 01  |h 91-111