Five Barriers to a Productive Conversation on Guns and Safety

How can Americans engage in a more productive conversation when it comes to issues of guns and public safety? Five ideas on how to improve the public conversation.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:National Civic Review. - National Civic League. - 109(2020), 1, Seite 39-48
1. Verfasser: Green, Chris (VerfasserIn)
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2020
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:National Civic Review
Schlagworte:Applied sciences Behavioral sciences Education Business Law
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST132285878
003 DE-627
005 20240625153135.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220306s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)JST132285878 
035 |a (JST)naticivirevi.109.1.0039 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Green, Chris  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Five Barriers to a Productive Conversation on Guns and Safety 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a How can Americans engage in a more productive conversation when it comes to issues of guns and public safety? Five ideas on how to improve the public conversation. 
540 |a © 2020 National Civic League 
650 4 |a Applied sciences  |x Technology  |x Weapons  |x Projectile weapons  |x Guns 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Sociology  |x Human societies  |x Public safety 
650 4 |a Education  |x Formal education  |x Pedagogy  |x Educational methods  |x Educational research  |x Graduate surveys 
650 4 |a Business  |x Business economics  |x Commercial production  |x Productivity 
650 4 |a Law  |x Federal law  |x United States federal law  |x United States constitutional law  |x United States Constitution  |x Constitutional amendments  |x Bill of Rights  |x Second Amendment 
650 4 |a Applied sciences  |x Technology  |x Weapons  |x Projectile weapons  |x Guns 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Sociology  |x Human societies  |x Public safety 
650 4 |a Education  |x Formal education  |x Pedagogy  |x Educational methods  |x Educational research  |x Graduate surveys 
650 4 |a Business  |x Business economics  |x Commercial production  |x Productivity 
650 4 |a Law  |x Federal law  |x United States federal law  |x United States constitutional law  |x United States Constitution  |x Constitutional amendments  |x Bill of Rights  |x Second Amendment 
655 4 |a research-article 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t National Civic Review  |d National Civic League  |g 109(2020), 1, Seite 39-48  |w (DE-627)341340782  |w (DE-600)2066786-3  |x 15427811  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:109  |g year:2020  |g number:1  |g pages:39-48 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.32543/naticivirevi.109.1.0039  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_73 
912 |a GBV_ILN_95 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_151 
912 |a GBV_ILN_161 
912 |a GBV_ILN_206 
912 |a GBV_ILN_213 
912 |a GBV_ILN_230 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_293 
912 |a GBV_ILN_602 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2122 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4326 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4338 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4367 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 109  |j 2020  |e 1  |h 39-48