An Investigation of Prospective Memory with Output Monitoring in Preschool Children

The ability to perform an intended behavior in some future circumstance, known as prospective memory (PM), is an important cognitive ability for young children to develop. In this study, we examined PM in preschool children, with the addition of an output monitoring component, which is the ability t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of American Folklore. - University of Illinois Press, 2013. - 131(2018), 2, Seite 201-210
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Veröffentlicht: 2018
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Journal of American Folklore
Schlagworte:prospective memory output monitoring preschool children Social sciences Philosophy Behavioral sciences Information science Education
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST132217376
003 DE-627
005 20240625152808.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220303s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||en c
035 |a (DE-627)JST132217376 
035 |a (JST)amerjpsyc.131.2.0201 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a en 
245 1 3 |a An Investigation of Prospective Memory with Output Monitoring in Preschool Children 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The ability to perform an intended behavior in some future circumstance, known as prospective memory (PM), is an important cognitive ability for young children to develop. In this study, we examined PM in preschool children, with the addition of an output monitoring component, which is the ability to remember whether a previously intended action was completed. Participants were engaged in an ongoing task of sorting cards with a variety of images such as animals, tools, and foods by the size of pictures on the card. They were also instructed to sort any cards with animals into cardboard boxes marked as zoos. The first time any given animal was seen, it was to be placed in "Zoo 1," and if the same animal was noticed again, it was to be placed in "Zoo 2." Participants completed the task 3 times (each with different targets) on 3 separate days. Participants' PM accuracy improved with practice. There was a relationship between age and PM performance on the first trial, with older children detecting more PM targets. This relationship was not present on the second and third trials, and a significant relationship between ongoing task errors and PM performance emerged, such that making fewer errors on the sorting task was associated with better PM performance. Regarding output monitoring errors, children most frequently placed both occurrences of the same PM target in the first zoo. 
540 |a Copyright 2018 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois 
650 4 |a prospective memory 
650 4 |a output monitoring 
650 4 |a preschool children 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Human geography  |x Land use  |x Public space  |x Public land  |x Parks  |x Zoos 
650 4 |a Philosophy  |x Applied philosophy  |x Philosophy of science  |x Scientific method  |x Experimentation 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Psychology  |x Cognitive psychology  |x Memory  |x Working memory  |x Prospective memory 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Population studies  |x Human populations  |x Persons  |x Children  |x Preschool children 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Psychology  |x Cognitive psychology  |x Memory 
650 4 |a Information science  |x Information management  |x Information classification  |x Card sorting 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Population studies  |x Human populations  |x Persons  |x Children 
650 4 |a Education  |x Formal education  |x Pedagogy  |x Grade levels  |x Early childhood education  |x Preschool education 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Population studies  |x Human populations  |x Persons  |x Adults 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Psychology  |x Developmental psychology  |x Child psychology  |x ARTICLES 
655 4 |a research-article 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of American Folklore  |d University of Illinois Press, 2013  |g 131(2018), 2, Seite 201-210  |w (DE-627)330564609  |w (DE-600)2050513-9  |x 15351882  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:131  |g year:2018  |g number:2  |g pages:201-210 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/amerjpsyc.131.2.0201  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_1200 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2111 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2875 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2933 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2950 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2982 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4326 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4367 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 131  |j 2018  |e 2  |h 201-210