|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000caa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
JST132217333 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20240625152807.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
220303s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||en c |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)JST132217333
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (JST)amerjpsyc.131.2.0151
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a en
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Asymmetry in Similarity Formation: Extension of Similarity Theory to Open Sets of Features
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2018
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The current work shows the extension of similarity theory to open sets of features. Increasing similarity between two objects while deleting distinctive features and adding common features results in different effects depending on the original similarity. When the similarity is greater than 0.5, deleting distinctive features is more effective. When the similarity value is less than 0.5, adding common features is more effective. When we compare an object with its ideal, common features are positive and distinctive features are negative, whereas when we compare an object with its anti-ideal, common features are negative and distinctive features are positive. Consequently, greater strength of negative or positive features in increasing similarity depends on both the value of original similarity and whether the object is compared with its ideal or to its anti-ideal. In this way the positive–negative asymmetry is revealed. Theoretical simulations and a brief empirical demonstration of how the model works have shown that for similarity exceeding 0.5 of a compared object to its ideal, deleting negative features had a stronger effect on the positive image of a particular object than adding positive features of the same value. The mechanism presented is universal and refers to estimation and comparison of all natural stimuli, which can be defined by means of open sets of features.
|
| 540 |
|
|
|a Copyright 2018 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a features of similarity
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a distinctive and common features
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a contrast model
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a positive–negative asymmetry
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Philosophy
|x Metaphilosophy
|x Philosophical object
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Social sciences
|x Human geography
|x Political geography
|x Metropolitan areas
|x Cities
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Behavioral sciences
|x Psychology
|x Cognitive psychology
|x Perception
|x Perceptual processing
|x Perceptual organization
|x Perceptual similarity
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Mathematics
|x Pure mathematics
|x Geometry
|x Descriptive geometry
|x Similarity theorem
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Behavioral sciences
|x Psychology
|x Cognitive psychology
|x Memory
|x Memory recall
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Behavioral sciences
|x Psychology
|x Cognitive psychology
|x Cognitive models
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Mathematics
|x Pure mathematics
|x Geometry
|x Geometric shapes
|x Conic sections
|x Hyperbolas
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Business
|x Business administration
|x Corporate communications
|x External corporate communications
|x Marketing
|x Branding
|x Brand identification
|x Brand image
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Behavioral sciences
|x Psychology
|x Cognitive psychology
|x Memory
|x ARTICLES
|
| 655 |
|
4 |
|a research-article
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Journal of American Folklore
|d University of Illinois Press, 2013
|g 131(2018), 2, Seite 151-159
|w (DE-627)330564609
|w (DE-600)2050513-9
|x 15351882
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:131
|g year:2018
|g number:2
|g pages:151-159
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/amerjpsyc.131.2.0151
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_JST
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_11
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_20
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_22
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_24
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_31
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_39
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_40
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_60
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_62
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_63
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_69
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_70
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_90
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_100
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_110
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_120
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_285
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_374
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_702
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_1200
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2001
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2003
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2005
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2006
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2007
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2008
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2009
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2010
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2011
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2014
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2015
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2018
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2020
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2021
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2026
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2027
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2044
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2050
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2056
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2057
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2061
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2107
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2111
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2190
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2875
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2933
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2949
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2950
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2982
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4012
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4035
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4037
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4046
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4112
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4125
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4126
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4242
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4249
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4251
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4305
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4306
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4307
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4313
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4322
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4323
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4324
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4325
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4326
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4335
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4346
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4367
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4393
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4700
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 131
|j 2018
|e 2
|h 151-159
|