Schism and the Spirit in Hugh Bourne's Theology

It is normally argued that theological issues were not at stake in the separation of the Primitive Methodist Connexion from Wesleyan Methodism. While it is true that the flashpoint issues were methodological, there were underlying theological differences that contributed to the schism. Primitive Met...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Wesley and Methodist Studies. - Clements Academic, 2009. - 10(2018), 2, Seite 177-196
1. Verfasser:	Pedlar, James E. (VerfasserIn)
Format:	Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:	English
Veröffentlicht:	2018
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:	Wesley and Methodist Studies
Schlagworte:	Hugh Bourne Primitive Methodism Holy Spirit church schism Religion Arts Philosophy


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	JST132214806
003	DE-627
005	20240625152757.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	220303s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
035			\|a (DE-627)JST132214806
035			\|a (JST)weslmethstud.10.2.0177
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Pedlar, James E. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Schism and the Spirit in Hugh Bourne's Theology
264		1	\|c 2018
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a It is normally argued that theological issues were not at stake in the separation of the Primitive Methodist Connexion from Wesleyan Methodism. While it is true that the flashpoint issues were methodological, there were underlying theological differences that contributed to the schism. Primitive Methodist co-founder Hugh Bourne had a pneumatocentric theology that prioritized the personal work of the Holy Spirit over the Spirit's work through the community. His Spirit-centred perspective led the Primitive Methodists to a more participatory and egalitarian understanding of the church, but offered little reason to resist separation from Wesleyan Methodism when conflict arose.
540			\|a Copyright © 2018 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.
650		4	\|a Hugh Bourne
650		4	\|a Primitive Methodism
650		4	\|a Holy Spirit
650		4	\|a church
650		4	\|a schism
650		4	\|a Religion \|x Spiritual belief systems \|x Christianity \|x Protestantism \|x Methodism
650		4	\|a Religion \|x Theology
650		4	\|a Religion \|x Spiritual belief systems \|x Christianity \|x Protestantism \|x Quakers
650		4	\|a Religion \|x Theology \|x Practical theology \|x Spiritual leaders \|x Clergy \|x Preachers
650		4	\|a Religion \|x Spiritual belief systems \|x Christianity
650		4	\|a Religion \|x Theology \|x Systematic theology \|x Doctrinal theology \|x Religious orthodoxy \|x Schisms
650		4	\|a Religion \|x Theology \|x Practical theology \|x Religious practices \|x Prayer
650		4	\|a Arts \|x Applied arts \|x Architecture \|x Architectural elements \|x Interior spaces \|x Rooms
650		4	\|a Philosophy \|x Metaphysics \|x Philosophy of mind \|x Concept of mind \|x Consciousness theory \|x Monopsychism \|x Soul
650		4	\|a Religion \|x Theology \|x Systematic theology \|x Doctrinal theology \|x Divine attributes \|x Divinity
650		4	\|a Religion \|x Spiritual belief systems \|x Christianity \|x Protestantism \|x Methodism
650		4	\|a Religion \|x Theology
650		4	\|a Religion \|x Spiritual belief systems \|x Christianity \|x Protestantism \|x Quakers
650		4	\|a Religion \|x Theology \|x Practical theology \|x Spiritual leaders \|x Clergy \|x Preachers
650		4	\|a Religion \|x Spiritual belief systems \|x Christianity
650		4	\|a Religion \|x Theology \|x Systematic theology \|x Doctrinal theology \|x Religious orthodoxy \|x Schisms
650		4	\|a Religion \|x Theology \|x Practical theology \|x Religious practices \|x Prayer
650		4	\|a Arts \|x Applied arts \|x Architecture \|x Architectural elements \|x Interior spaces \|x Rooms
650		4	\|a Philosophy \|x Metaphysics \|x Philosophy of mind \|x Concept of mind \|x Consciousness theory \|x Monopsychism \|x Soul
650		4	\|a Religion \|x Theology \|x Systematic theology \|x Doctrinal theology \|x Divine attributes \|x Divinity
655		4	\|a research-article
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Wesley and Methodist Studies \|d Clements Academic, 2009 \|g 10(2018), 2, Seite 177-196 \|w (DE-627)823700518 \|w (DE-600)2818932-2 \|x 22911731 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:10 \|g year:2018 \|g number:2 \|g pages:177-196
856	4	0	\|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/weslmethstud.10.2.0177 \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_JST
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_374
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2018
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2057
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2107
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2949
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2950
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4346
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4392
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 10 \|j 2018 \|e 2 \|h 177-196