Sino-Indian Border Conflict and Implications for Bilateral Relations

The dynamism of Sino-Indian relations is a key determinant of the connectivity, geopolitics and geo-economics of the region and a driver of politics and economy of South Asia. China and India are collaborating with each other in multiple sectors but at the same time they are unable to resolve their...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World Review of Political Economy. - Pluto Journals. - 15(2018), 2, Seite 57-69
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Veröffentlicht: 2018
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:World Review of Political Economy
Schlagworte:Border Conflict Bilateral Relations Geopolitical Situation Geo-Economics Territorial Disputes Intraregional Connectivity Social sciences Behavioral sciences Political science Economics Law
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST131914847
003 DE-627
005 20240625150526.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220303s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||en c
035 |a (DE-627)JST131914847 
035 |a (JST)polipers.15.2.0057 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a en 
245 1 0 |a Sino-Indian Border Conflict and Implications for Bilateral Relations 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The dynamism of Sino-Indian relations is a key determinant of the connectivity, geopolitics and geo-economics of the region and a driver of politics and economy of South Asia. China and India are collaborating with each other in multiple sectors but at the same time they are unable to resolve their border disputes. Due to that, tensions on the border are a routine matter. In June 2017, a border conflict escalated to a ten weeks military standoff at the Doklam Plateau, i.e., an area claimed by China and owned by Bhutan. There was a continuous threat that military stalemate will turn into a full-fledged war anytime but nevertheless the conflict ended without any major confrontation. There were certain factors including geopolitical situation, trade relations, economic ties, power imbalance and international image, etc. that led to de-escalation of conflict. The paper recommends that both the nations have to work on some permanent solutions for resolution of these territorial disputes because they may sabotage the peace process anytime affecting not only the bilateral relations but peace and harmony of the entire South Asian region. 
540 |a © 2018, Institute of Policy Studies 
650 4 |a Border Conflict 
650 4 |a Bilateral Relations 
650 4 |a Geopolitical Situation 
650 4 |a Geo-Economics 
650 4 |a Territorial Disputes 
650 4 |a Intraregional Connectivity 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Human geography  |x Political geography  |x International borders  |x Territorial disputes 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Human behavior  |x Social behavior  |x Social interaction  |x Conflict  |x War conflict 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Government  |x Public administration  |x Public policy  |x Foreign policy  |x Bilateralism 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Human geography  |x Political geography  |x International borders 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Politics  |x International politics  |x International relations  |x Diplomacy  |x Diplomatic relations 
650 4 |a Economics  |x Economic policy  |x War economics 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Politics  |x International politics  |x International relations  |x Peacetime 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Human geography  |x Political geography  |x Borderlands 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Human geography  |x Political geography  |x Countries 
650 4 |a Law  |x International law  |x Treaties  |x Peace treaties 
655 4 |a research-article 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t World Review of Political Economy  |d Pluto Journals  |g 15(2018), 2, Seite 57-69  |w (DE-627)783790899  |w (DE-600)2766740-6  |x 20428928  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:15  |g year:2018  |g number:2  |g pages:57-69 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13169/polipers.15.2.0057  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_23 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_26 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_73 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_95 
912 |a GBV_ILN_105 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_151 
912 |a GBV_ILN_161 
912 |a GBV_ILN_187 
912 |a GBV_ILN_206 
912 |a GBV_ILN_213 
912 |a GBV_ILN_230 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_293 
912 |a GBV_ILN_370 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_602 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2111 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2129 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2950 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4326 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4338 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4367 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 15  |j 2018  |e 2  |h 57-69