LIBERTÀ CONTRO VANTAGGI IN ROUSSEAU E RAWLS

Abstract: The priority of liberty for Rousseau and Rawls. Both Rousseau and Rawls see extreme inequality as a condition which undermines political liberties. By looking into the relationship between bondage and inequality as it unfolds in Rousseau’s Discours sur l’Inégalité and in Rawls’s reply to H...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rivista di Storia della Filosofia (1984-). - Franco Angeli, 1984. - 70(2015), 1, Seite 79-92
1. Verfasser: Lamonica, Gabriella (VerfasserIn)
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:Italian
Veröffentlicht: 2015
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Rivista di Storia della Filosofia (1984-)
Schlagworte:Rousseau Rawls liberty advantages equality priority
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST128249161
003 DE-627
005 20240625112918.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210701s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||ita c
035 |a (DE-627)JST128249161 
035 |a (JST)24873183 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a ita 
100 1 |a Lamonica, Gabriella  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a LIBERTÀ CONTRO VANTAGGI IN ROUSSEAU E RAWLS 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract: The priority of liberty for Rousseau and Rawls. Both Rousseau and Rawls see extreme inequality as a condition which undermines political liberties. By looking into the relationship between bondage and inequality as it unfolds in Rousseau’s Discours sur l’Inégalité and in Rawls’s reply to Hart on liberty and its priority, a coextension between liberty and the individual can be found, in which liberty plays a normative role. This explains why both Rousseau and Rawls insist on ruling out trade-offs between liberty (or the basic liberties in Rawls’s first principle) and other advantages. 
540 |a Copyright © 2015 FrancoAngeli s.r.l. 
650 4 |a Rousseau 
650 4 |a Rawls 
650 4 |a liberty 
650 4 |a advantages 
650 4 |a equality 
650 4 |a priority 
655 4 |a research-article 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Rivista di Storia della Filosofia (1984-)  |d Franco Angeli, 1984  |g 70(2015), 1, Seite 79-92  |w (DE-627)557571278  |w (DE-600)2404414-3  |x 19725558  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:70  |g year:2015  |g number:1  |g pages:79-92 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/24873183  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2950 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 70  |j 2015  |e 1  |h 79-92