Parallel Stories in theĀvaśyakacūrṇiand the MūlasarvāstivādaVinaya:A Preliminary Investigation

While it has been known for several decades that theĀvaśyakacūrṇiof the śvetāmbara Jaina tradition and the MūlasarvāstivādaVinayaof the Buddhist tradition share some common narrative plots or motifs, so far no detailed study has been made to understand the different ways in which parallel narrative...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of American Oriental Society. - American Oriental Society, 2012. - 137(2017), 2, Seite 315-347
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Veröffentlicht: 2017
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Journal of American Oriental Society
Schlagworte:Religion Philosophy Social sciences Arts Health sciences Behavioral sciences Economics Political science
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:While it has been known for several decades that theĀvaśyakacūrṇiof the śvetāmbara Jaina tradition and the MūlasarvāstivādaVinayaof the Buddhist tradition share some common narrative plots or motifs, so far no detailed study has been made to understand the different ways in which parallel narrative material is utilized in the two texts. Through a comparative study of stories of three characters (Prince Abhaya, the physician Jīvaka, and King Udrāyaṇa) in the MūlasarvāstivādaVinayaand their counterparts in theĀvaśyakacūrṇi, this paper demonstrates that the Buddhists and the Jainas who composed or redacted the two texts exploited parallel narrative plots or motifs along different lines and for different purposes. In particular, with regard to Jīvaka, who is widely known among Buddhists as a model of medical skill and religious faith, this paper argues that the fact that Jīvaka is prominently featured in Buddhist literature but finds no parallel in Jaina literature may be explained by the different attitudes of the two religions to medical healing and to the role of secular physicians in general.
ISSN:00030279
DOI:10.7817/jameroriesoci.137.2.0315