Whence Came Mandarin? Qīng Guānhuà, the Běijīng Dialect, and the National Language Standard in Early Republican China

Whence Came Mandarin? Qīng Guānhuà, the Běijīng Dialect, and the National Language Standard in Early Republican China

While the language of Běijīng served together with Manchu as the court vernacular in the Qīng dynasty, the city's dialect was not widely accepted in China as the standard for Guānhuà even in the late nineteenth century. The preferred form was a mixed Mandarin koiné with roots going back much ea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of American Oriental Society. - American Oriental Society, 2012. - 137(2017), 1, Seite 63-88
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Veröffentlicht: 2017
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Journal of American Oriental Society
Schlagworte:Linguistics Arts Behavioral sciences Education
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST12794527X
003 DE-627
005 20240625110914.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210116s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||en c
024 7 |a 10.7817/jameroriesoci.137.1.0063  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)JST12794527X 
035 |a (JST)jameroriesoci.137.1.0063 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a en 
245 1 0 |a Whence Came Mandarin? Qīng Guānhuà, the Běijīng Dialect, and the National Language Standard in Early Republican China 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a While the language of Běijīng served together with Manchu as the court vernacular in the Qīng dynasty, the city's dialect was not widely accepted in China as the standard for Guānhuà even in the late nineteenth century. The preferred form was a mixed Mandarin koiné with roots going back much earlier, such as that represented in Lǐ Rǔzhēn's mid-Qīng rime compendiumLǐshì yīnjiàn. A similar form of mixed Mandarin served briefly as the National Pronunciation of China in the early twentieth century and came to be calledlán-qīng Guānhuà‘blue-green Mandarin’. This heterogeneous norm incorporated features of a variety of Mandarin dialects and eventually came to be disparaged as an unrefined cousin of the pure Běijīng standard. Yet in origin the old National Pronunciation was designed to encompass a mix of regional forms and intended to contain the most broadly accepted elements of various Mandarin types. The evolution and development of the composite Guānhuà norm reveal much about Chinese linguistic attitudes of the early nineteenth through early twentieth centuries and shed light on various perspectives about what standard Chinese should be and what a Mandarin-based norm should represent. Broad popular acceptance of Běijīng as the governing norm for pronunciation began slowly to take hold only after the Ministry of Education of the Republic of China finally officially promoted Běijīng as the national standard in the 1930s. Yet it then had to compete with a new mixed vernacular orthography calledLatinxua sinwenz. Běijīng was not firmly established as the norm until the People's Republic of China definitively declared the city's dialect as standard in the 1950s. 
540 |a © 2017 American Oriental Society 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Language  |x Phonology  |x Phonetics  |x Pronunciation 
650 4 |a Arts  |x Performing arts  |x Music  |x Music theory  |x Musical notation  |x Solmization 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Language  |x Phonology 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Ethnology  |x Ethnolinguistics  |x Dialectology  |x Dialects 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Psychology  |x Social psychology  |x Social perception  |x Reputation  |x Prestige 
650 4 |a Education  |x Formal education  |x Educational quality  |x Educational standards 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Language  |x Orthographies 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Language  |x Phonology  |x Speech segments  |x Syllables 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Language 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Ethnology  |x Ethnolinguistics  |x Dialectology  |x Dialects  |x Regional dialects 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Language  |x Phonology  |x Phonetics  |x Pronunciation 
650 4 |a Arts  |x Performing arts  |x Music  |x Music theory  |x Musical notation  |x Solmization 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Language  |x Phonology 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Ethnology  |x Ethnolinguistics  |x Dialectology  |x Dialects 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Psychology  |x Social psychology  |x Social perception  |x Reputation  |x Prestige 
650 4 |a Education  |x Formal education  |x Educational quality  |x Educational standards 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Language  |x Orthographies 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Language  |x Phonology  |x Speech segments  |x Syllables 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Language 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Ethnology  |x Ethnolinguistics  |x Dialectology  |x Dialects  |x Regional dialects 
655 4 |a research-article 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of American Oriental Society  |d American Oriental Society, 2012  |g 137(2017), 1, Seite 63-88  |w (DE-627)340874597  |w (DE-600)2065887-4  |x 00030279  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:137  |g year:2017  |g number:1  |g pages:63-88 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7817/jameroriesoci.137.1.0063  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.7817/jameroriesoci.137.1.0063  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_206 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2025 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2031 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2038 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2048 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2055 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2111 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2113 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2933 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2950 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4326 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4338 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4367 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 137  |j 2017  |e 1  |h 63-88