Emergence of Institutional Islamophobia: The Case of the Charity Commission of England and Wales

The Charity Commission of England and Wales supports and regulates the charity sector whose emergence can be traced back to the early seventeenth century. However, there has been limited academic scrutiny of its regulatory approach particularly regarding Muslim-identified charities. This article fir...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World Review of Political Economy. - Pluto Journals. - 3(2017), 1, Seite 23-49
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Veröffentlicht: 2017
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:World Review of Political Economy
Schlagworte:Charity Commission of England and Wales Islamophobia Foucault institutional racism disciplinary techniques governmentality Shawcross charity Philosophy Behavioral sciences mehr... Law Political science
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST127804404
003 DE-627
005 20240625105800.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210116s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||en c
024 7 |a 10.13169/reorient.3.1.0023  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)JST127804404 
035 |a (JST)reorient.3.1.0023 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a en 
245 1 0 |a Emergence of Institutional Islamophobia: The Case of the Charity Commission of England and Wales 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The Charity Commission of England and Wales supports and regulates the charity sector whose emergence can be traced back to the early seventeenth century. However, there has been limited academic scrutiny of its regulatory approach particularly regarding Muslim-identified charities. This article first challenges the Commission's claim to be an independent body, and second questions whether its contemporary role reveals institutional Islamophobia. It is argued that, since partnering with the UK government's "Prevent" agenda – or war on terror – to control ungoverned spaces for extremism, the Commission has assumed a policing role. This role is analysed through discourse theory and a Foucauldian approach to disciplinary techniques. To analyse the repertoire of institutionalised Islamophobia, the study draws upon Carmichael and Hamilton's definition of institutional racism, the Parekh Report, and Pilkington's ten components of institutional racism. In challenging the Commission's claim to independence, the article highlights the changes in its practices and structure. It argues the structural changes have deflected accountabilities of the board members and chair and resulted in the politicisation of their selection process. Furthermore, the shifts in the Commission's practices have had a disproportionate impact on Muslim charities, where thirty-eight per cent of all disclosed statutory investigations conducted are on Muslim charities despite representing only 1.21 per cent of the sector. This article provides a discourse analysis of the regulatory approach of a significant public body and departs from investigations of subjective and media representations of Muslims that have monopolised research on Islamophobia. 
540 |a © 2017 Pluto Journals 
650 4 |a Charity Commission of England and Wales 
650 4 |a Islamophobia 
650 4 |a Foucault 
650 4 |a institutional racism 
650 4 |a disciplinary techniques 
650 4 |a governmentality 
650 4 |a Shawcross 
650 4 |a charity 
650 4 |a Philosophy  |x Axiology  |x Ethics  |x Normative ethics  |x Morality  |x Virtue  |x Charity 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Ethnology  |x Ethnic groups  |x Ethnoreligious groups  |x Muslims 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Psychology  |x Personality psychology  |x Psychological attitudes  |x Prejudices  |x Religious prejudice  |x Islamophobia 
650 4 |a Law  |x Criminal law  |x Criminal offenses  |x Federal criminal offenses  |x Terrorism  |x Religious terrorism 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Psychology  |x Personality psychology  |x Psychological attitudes  |x Prejudices  |x Racism 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Political philosophy  |x Political ideologies  |x Political extremism 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Psychology  |x Personality psychology  |x Psychological attitudes  |x Prejudices  |x Racism  |x Institutional racism 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Civics  |x Civil society 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Government  |x Government services  |x Law enforcement  |x Police  |x Police services 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Military science  |x Armed conflict  |x War  |x Warfare  |x Unconventional warfare  |x Counterterrorism  |x War on Terror 
650 4 |a Philosophy  |x Axiology  |x Ethics  |x Normative ethics  |x Morality  |x Virtue  |x Charity 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Ethnology  |x Ethnic groups  |x Ethnoreligious groups  |x Muslims 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Psychology  |x Personality psychology  |x Psychological attitudes  |x Prejudices  |x Religious prejudice  |x Islamophobia 
650 4 |a Law  |x Criminal law  |x Criminal offenses  |x Federal criminal offenses  |x Terrorism  |x Religious terrorism 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Psychology  |x Personality psychology  |x Psychological attitudes  |x Prejudices  |x Racism 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Political philosophy  |x Political ideologies  |x Political extremism 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Psychology  |x Personality psychology  |x Psychological attitudes  |x Prejudices  |x Racism  |x Institutional racism 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Civics  |x Civil society 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Government  |x Government services  |x Law enforcement  |x Police  |x Police services 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Military science  |x Armed conflict  |x War  |x Warfare  |x Unconventional warfare  |x Counterterrorism  |x War on Terror  |x Articles 
655 4 |a research-article 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t World Review of Political Economy  |d Pluto Journals  |g 3(2017), 1, Seite 23-49  |w (DE-627)783790899  |w (DE-600)2766740-6  |x 20428928  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:3  |g year:2017  |g number:1  |g pages:23-49 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13169/reorient.3.1.0023  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.13169/reorient.3.1.0023  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_23 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_26 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_73 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_95 
912 |a GBV_ILN_105 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_151 
912 |a GBV_ILN_161 
912 |a GBV_ILN_187 
912 |a GBV_ILN_206 
912 |a GBV_ILN_213 
912 |a GBV_ILN_230 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_293 
912 |a GBV_ILN_370 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_602 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2111 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2129 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2950 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4326 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4338 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4367 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 3  |j 2017  |e 1  |h 23-49