|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000caa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
JST127032614 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20240625101651.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
200318s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)JST127032614
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (JST)26878969
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Lalander, Rickard
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Political economy of state-indigenous liaisons
|b Ecuador in times of Alianza PAIS
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2019
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This article analyses the contentious liaisons between the indigenous movement and the state in Ecuador during the government of Alianza PAIS under the presidency of Rafael Correa (2007-2017). The research question examines to which measure, how and why the shift from neoliberal to leftist administrations could have affected the principal strategic repertoire of the indigenous movement. Leaning on a political economy approach and social movement theorizing, and accentuating the relative power balance between the indigenous movement and the state, it focuses on indigenous oppositional strategies and the ambivalent attitude of the state regarding participatory democracy and the rights of the indigenous peo-ples. By contrasting this period with the neoliberal 1990s – considered the heyday of the indigenous struggle – we examine contemporary strategic responses of the movement amidst the new political setting characterized by hyper-presidentialism and a systematic effort to de-corporatize the state. A central finding is that, while retaining its powerful or-ganizational network which could be reactivated during critical situations, the indigenous movement weakened in relation to the 1990s. This relative decline is manifested in three types of social movement relationships: between leaders and grassroots (mobilizing capacity); between the movement and its alliance partners (alliance politics); and between the movement and the legal institutional terrain of the state (institutional participation). Este artículo analiza las relaciones conflictivas entre el movimiento indígena y el Estado en Ecuador durante el gobierno de Alianza PAIS cuando ejercía la presidencia Rafael Correa, (2007-2017). La pregunta de investigación es la medida en la cual, cómo y por qué el des-plazamiento desde el neoliberalismo hacia la izquierda pudo afectar los principales reperto-rios de estrategias del movimiento indígena. Desde un enfoque de economía política y de las teorías de los movimientos sociales y considerando los cambios en el balance de poder entre el movimiento indígena y el Estado, el artículo se enfoca en las estrategias de oposición de los indígenas y en la actitud ambivalente del Estado respecto a la democracia participativa y a los derechos de los pueblos indígenas. En contraste con los años neoliberales (1990s) que fueron considerados los de mayor influencia de la lucha indígena, examinamos las estrate-gias contemporáneas del movimiento en medio de las nuevas circunstancias políticas carac-terizadas por el hiper-presidencialismo y un sistemático esfuerzo de descorporativización del Estado. Un hallazgo central del trabajo es que, aunque conserva la potencia de su poderosa red organizativa, que le permite reactivarse en coyunturas críticas, el movimiento indígena se debilitó en comparación con los años 1990. Este declive relativo se manifiesta en tres campos: la relación entre los líderes y las bases (capacidad de movilización); la relación entre el movimiento y sus aliados (la política de alianzas); y la relación entre el movimiento y el terreno institucional del Estado (participación institucional).
|
| 540 |
|
|
|a © Rickard Lalander, Magnus Lembke, Pablo Ospina Peralta
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Behavioral sciences
|x Anthropology
|x Ethnology
|x Ethnic groups
|x Indigenous peoples
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Political science
|x Political sociology
|x Political movements
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Behavioral sciences
|x Sociology
|x Human societies
|x Social movements
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Behavioral sciences
|x Human behavior
|x Social behavior
|x Social interaction
|x Cooperation
|x Alliances
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Economics
|x Economic theory
|x Neoliberalism
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Economics
|x Economic disciplines
|x Political economy
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Political science
|x Political sociology
|x Political movements
|x Protest movements
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Political science
|x Political philosophy
|x Political ideologies
|x Corporatism
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Political science
|x Politics
|x Political processes
|x Political elections
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Political science
|x Politics
|x Indigenous politics
|x Special Collection: Elite and Popular Responses to a Left in Crisis
|
| 655 |
|
4 |
|a research-article
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Lembke, Magnus
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Peralta, Pablo Ospina
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe
|d Centrum voor Studie en Documentatie van Latijns Amerika (CEDLA)
|g (2019), 108, Seite 193-220
|w (DE-627)515536415
|w (DE-600)2241655-9
|x 18794750
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g year:2019
|g number:108
|g pages:193-220
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/26878969
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_JST
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_11
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_20
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_22
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_23
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_24
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_31
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_39
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_40
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_60
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_62
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_63
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_65
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_69
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_70
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_73
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_95
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_100
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_105
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_110
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_151
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_161
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_213
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_230
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_285
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_293
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_370
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_374
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_602
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_702
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2001
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2003
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2005
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2006
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2007
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2008
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2009
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2010
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2011
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2014
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2015
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2018
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2020
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2021
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2026
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2027
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2044
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2050
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2056
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2057
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2061
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2086
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2106
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2107
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2190
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2232
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2548
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2949
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2950
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4012
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4035
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4037
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4046
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4112
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4125
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4126
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4238
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4242
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4249
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4251
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4305
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4306
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4307
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4313
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4322
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4323
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4324
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4325
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4326
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4335
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4338
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4346
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4367
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4393
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4700
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|j 2019
|e 108
|h 193-220
|