Narratives of Buddhist legislation: Textual authority and legal heterodoxy in seventeenth through nineteenth-century Burma

Narratives of Buddhist legislation: Textual authority and legal heterodoxy in seventeenth through nineteenth-century Burma

For more than a century scholars of central and western mainland Southeast Asia have sought to characterise the status of dhammasattha — the predominant genre of written law from the region before colonialism — and define its authority vis-à-vis Pali Buddhism. For some, dhammasattha texts represent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. - Cambridge University Press. - 44(2013), 1, Seite 118-144
1. Verfasser: Lammerts, D. Christian (VerfasserIn)
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2013
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Journal of Southeast Asian Studies
Schlagworte:Religion Social sciences Political science Law Culture
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST124316883
003 DE-627
005 20240625074207.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190102s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)JST124316883 
035 |a (JST)23321693 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Lammerts, D. Christian  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Narratives of Buddhist legislation: Textual authority and legal heterodoxy in seventeenth through nineteenth-century Burma 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a For more than a century scholars of central and western mainland Southeast Asia have sought to characterise the status of dhammasattha — the predominant genre of written law from the region before colonialism — and define its authority vis-à-vis Pali Buddhism. For some, dhammasattha texts represent a predominantly 'secular' or 'customary' tradition, while for others they are seen as largely commensurate with, if not directly derived from, the religio-political ideas of a cosmopolitan and purportedly canonical 'Theravāda'. However, scholarship has yet to investigate the way that regional authors during the late premodern period themselves understood the character and legitimacy of written law. The present article examines seventeenth through nineteenth-century Burmese narratives concerning the genealogy and status of dhammasattha to advance a pluralist conception of the relationship between law and religion in Southeast Asian history. This analysis addresses a historical context where ideas concerning Buddhist textual authority were in the process of development, and where there were multiple and competing discourses of legal ideology in play. For elite monastic critics closely connected with royalty, dhammasattha stood in problematic relation to authoritative taxonomies of scripture, and its jurisprudence was seen to contradict authorised accounts of the origin and nature of Buddhist law; the genre thus required reform to be brought into alignment with what were construed as orthodox legal imaginaries. The principal hermeneutic move these monastic commentators performed to achieve this involved redescribing dhammasattha in light of such accounts as a variety of Buddhist royal legislation and written law as the prerogative of the Buddhist state. 
540 |a © The National University of Singapore 2013 
650 4 |a Religion  |x Spiritual belief systems  |x Buddhism 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Communications  |x Communications media  |x Print media  |x Books  |x Treatises 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Communications  |x Narratives 
650 4 |a Religion  |x Theology  |x Practical theology  |x Sacred texts 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Sociology  |x Applied sociology  |x Sociology of religion  |x Religious laws  |x Canon laws 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Government  |x Government officials  |x Heads of state  |x Monarchs  |x Kings 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Ethnology  |x Ethnography  |x Asian studies  |x South Asian studies  |x Southeast Asian studies  |x Southeast Asian literature 
650 4 |a Law  |x Statutory law  |x Legislation 
650 4 |a Culture  |x Cultural institutions  |x Libraries  |x School libraries  |x Academic libraries 
650 4 |a Law  |x Jurisprudence 
655 4 |a research-article 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of Southeast Asian Studies  |d Cambridge University Press  |g 44(2013), 1, Seite 118-144  |w (DE-627)336153139  |w (DE-600)2060562-6  |x 14740680  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:44  |g year:2013  |g number:1  |g pages:118-144 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022463412000653  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_23 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_32 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_73 
912 |a GBV_ILN_74 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_95 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_105 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_121 
912 |a GBV_ILN_151 
912 |a GBV_ILN_152 
912 |a GBV_ILN_161 
912 |a GBV_ILN_165 
912 |a GBV_ILN_171 
912 |a GBV_ILN_187 
912 |a GBV_ILN_206 
912 |a GBV_ILN_213 
912 |a GBV_ILN_224 
912 |a GBV_ILN_230 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_293 
912 |a GBV_ILN_370 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_602 
912 |a GBV_ILN_636 
912 |a GBV_ILN_647 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2025 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2031 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2034 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2036 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2038 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2039 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2055 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2059 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2064 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2068 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2070 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2088 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2089 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2093 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2098 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2113 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2116 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2118 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2122 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2129 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2143 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2145 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2158 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2193 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2336 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2446 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2470 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2507 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2522 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2548 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2924 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2937 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2950 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4246 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4277 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4326 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4333 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4336 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4367 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4753 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 44  |j 2013  |e 1  |h 118-144