THE TRUMP PUBLIC LANDS REVOLUTION: REDEFINING "THE PUBLIC" IN PUBLIC LAND LAW

The Trump Administration's efforts to comprehensively dismantle Obama-era policies had special force in federal public land management The disassembling included a substantial reduction in the size of national monuments, a jettisoning of protections for sage grouse habitat, and a widespread fos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental Law. - Lewis & Clark Law School. - 48(2018), 2, Seite 311-375
1. Verfasser: Blumm, Michael C. (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Jamin, Olivier
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2018
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Environmental Law
Schlagworte:Social sciences Behavioral sciences Law Applied sciences Biological sciences
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST122990293
003 DE-627
005 20240625064001.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 181028s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)JST122990293 
035 |a (JST)44747224 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Blumm, Michael C.  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a THE TRUMP PUBLIC LANDS REVOLUTION: REDEFINING "THE PUBLIC" IN PUBLIC LAND LAW 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The Trump Administration's efforts to comprehensively dismantle Obama-era policies had special force in federal public land management The disassembling included a substantial reduction in the size of national monuments, a jettisoning of protections for sage grouse habitat, and a widespread fostering of fossil fuel-friendly policies, such as ending leasing moratona, attempting to revoke methane emission controls, and a scuttling hydraulic fracturing regulation. Congress was a willing partner in this deregulatory campaign, eliminating revised land-planning regulations, authorizing oil leasing in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and threatening to codify in statutes the Administration's regulatory rollbacks in order to make them more permanent. Collectively, these initiatives amounted to the most substantial rollback in public lands protections in American history. This Article surveys these events in the early days of the Trump Administration. The effect was to attempt to revolutionize public land law in arguably undemocratic terms, as there was little evidence of widespread public support for the rollbacks of land protections or the championing of fossil fuel developments. The agenda also included persistent calls in both the Administration and in Congress for more state and local control over federal public land management. We think that the Trump revolution reflected an attempt to fundamentally redefine the public in public land law and policy, narrowing the focus of governmental concern largely to those producing commodity production, especially fossil fuels. The long-term consequences are disturbing in terms of their potential costs and who will be saddled with paying them. Appendices to the Article detail the use of presidential authonty to establish national monuments over the past four decades and a "restoration agenda" of action items that might inform a post-Trump administration. 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Human geography  |x Land use  |x Public space  |x Public land 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Anthropology  |x Applied anthropology  |x Cultural anthropology  |x Monuments 
650 4 |a Law  |x Administrative law  |x Environmental law  |x Environmental legislation  |x National Environmental Policy Act 
650 4 |a Applied sciences  |x Engineering  |x Energy engineering  |x Fuels  |x Fossil fuels 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Zoology  |x Animals  |x Birds  |x Poultry  |x Grouse 
650 4 |a Law  |x Civil law  |x Contract law  |x Contracts  |x Leases 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Ecology  |x Applied ecology  |x Environmental management  |x Natural resource management  |x Land management 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Human geography  |x Federal lands 
650 4 |a Applied sciences  |x Engineering  |x Energy engineering  |x Fuels  |x Fossil fuels  |x Coal 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Conservation biology  |x Conservation agriculture  |x Habitat conservation 
655 4 |a research-article 
700 1 |a Jamin, Olivier  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Environmental Law  |d Lewis & Clark Law School  |g 48(2018), 2, Seite 311-375  |w (DE-627)320639770  |w (DE-600)2024916-0  |x 00462276  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:48  |g year:2018  |g number:2  |g pages:311-375 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/44747224  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_101 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_184 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2950 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4326 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 48  |j 2018  |e 2  |h 311-375