Private-community Partnerships : Investigating a New Approach to Conservation and Development in Uganda

Nature-based tourism is well recognised as a tool that can be used for neoliberal conservation. Proponents argue that such tourism can provide revenue for conservation activities, and income generating opportunities and other benefits for local people living at the destination. Private-Community Par...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation & Society. - Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd.. - 10(2012), 4, Seite 305-317
1. Verfasser: Ahebwa, Wilber Manyisa (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Van der Duim, V. René, Sandbrook, Chris G.
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2012
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation & Society
Schlagworte:nature-based tourism policy arrangement approach conservation development partnerships conservation enterprise Bwindi Impenetrable National Park Biological sciences Behavioral sciences Social sciences mehr... Environmental studies Economics Political science
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST120788438
003 DE-627
005 20240625051020.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180720s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)JST120788438 
035 |a (JST)26393086 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Ahebwa, Wilber Manyisa  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Private-community Partnerships  |b Investigating a New Approach to Conservation and Development in Uganda 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Nature-based tourism is well recognised as a tool that can be used for neoliberal conservation. Proponents argue that such tourism can provide revenue for conservation activities, and income generating opportunities and other benefits for local people living at the destination. Private-Community Partnerships (PCPs) are a particular form of hybrid intervention in which local benefits are claimed to be guaranteed through shared ownership of the tourism venture. In this paper, we evaluate one such partnership involving a high-end tourist eco-lodge at Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda. We examine the introduction, development, and implementation of this partnership using the policy arrangement approach. This is done through analysing the actors involved and excluded in the process, the emergence of coalitions and forces, power relations, the governing rules, and the role of framing discourses. The analysis reveals that the technical conceptualisation of the partnership arrangement failed to take proper account of political and contextual factors, resulting in escalating conflict up to the national level. The paper concludes that while more time is needed to evaluate the full impact of hybrid neoliberal approaches such as PCP, the unbalanced power relations they imply can create fertile conditions for political conflict that ultimately undermines their ‘win-win’ goals. 
540 |a Copyright: © Ahebwa et al. 2012 
650 4 |a nature-based tourism 
650 4 |a policy arrangement approach 
650 4 |a conservation 
650 4 |a development 
650 4 |a partnerships 
650 4 |a conservation enterprise 
650 4 |a Bwindi Impenetrable National Park 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Ecology  |x Applied ecology  |x Environmental management  |x Natural resource management  |x Nature conservation  |x Natural resources conservation 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Wildlife studies  |x Wildlife management  |x Wildlife conservation 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Human behavior  |x Social behavior  |x Social interaction  |x Collaboration 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Human geography  |x Land use  |x Public space  |x Protected areas 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Conservation biology  |x Biodiversity conservation 
650 4 |a Environmental studies  |x Environmental philosophy  |x Ecophilosophy  |x Environmentalism  |x Conservation movement 
650 4 |a Economics  |x Economic theory  |x Economic liberalism 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Government  |x Public administration  |x Public policy  |x Environmental policy  |x Conservation policy  |x Conservation programs 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Sociology  |x Human societies  |x Social groups  |x Communities 
650 4 |a Environmental studies  |x Environmental education  |x Conservation education  |x Article 
655 4 |a research-article 
700 1 |a Van der Duim, V. René  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sandbrook, Chris G.  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation & Society  |d Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd.  |g 10(2012), 4, Seite 305-317  |w (DE-627)506285898  |w (DE-600)2218067-9  |x 09753133  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:10  |g year:2012  |g number:4  |g pages:305-317 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/26393086  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_23 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_73 
912 |a GBV_ILN_74 
912 |a GBV_ILN_95 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_151 
912 |a GBV_ILN_161 
912 |a GBV_ILN_170 
912 |a GBV_ILN_206 
912 |a GBV_ILN_213 
912 |a GBV_ILN_230 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_293 
912 |a GBV_ILN_370 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_602 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2086 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2147 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2148 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2950 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4326 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4338 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4367 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 10  |j 2012  |e 4  |h 305-317