Results of a feasibility study: barriers and facilitators in implementing the Sherbrooke model in France

Objectives Return-to-work interventions associated with the workplace environment are often more effective than conventional care. The Sherbrooke model is an integrated intervention that has proved successful in preventing work disability due to low-back pain. Implementation, however, runs up agains...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. - NOROSH Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and health, 1975. - 41(2015), 3, Seite 223-233
1. Verfasser: Fassier, Jean-Baptiste (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Durand, Marie-José, Caillard, Jean-François, Roquelaure, Yves, Loisel, Patrick
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2015
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Schlagworte:Behavioral sciences Social sciences Political science Economics Health sciences Business
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST104064943
003 DE-627
005 20240624131100.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180527s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)JST104064943 
035 |a (JST)24466949 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Fassier, Jean-Baptiste  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Results of a feasibility study: barriers and facilitators in implementing the Sherbrooke model in France 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Objectives Return-to-work interventions associated with the workplace environment are often more effective than conventional care. The Sherbrooke model is an integrated intervention that has proved successful in preventing work disability due to low-back pain. Implementation, however, runs up against many obstacles, and failure has been reported in many countries. The present study sought to identify barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of the Sherbrooke model within the French health system. Methods A multiple case study with nested levels of analysis was performed in two regions of France. A conceptual framework was designed and refined to identify barriers and facilitators at the individual, organizational and contextual levels. Qualitative data were collected via semi-structured interview (N=22), focus groups (N=7), and observation and from the gray literature. Participants (N=61) belonged to three fields: healthcare, social insurance, and the workplace. Results Numerous barriers and facilitators were identified in each field and at each level, some specific and others common to workers in all fields. Individual and organizational barriers comprised lack of time and resources, discordant professional values, and perceived risk. Legal barriers comprised medical confidentiality, legal complexity, and priority given to primary prevention. Individual-level facilitators comprised needs and perceived benefits. Some organizations had concordant values and practices. Legal facilitators comprised possibilities of collaboration and gradual return to work. Conclusion The present feasibility analysis of implementing the Sherbrooke model revealed numerous barriers and facilitators suggesting a new implementation strategy be drawn up if failure is to be avoided. 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Human behavior  |x Social behavior  |x Group behavior  |x Group dynamics  |x Group facilitation 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Human geography  |x Workplaces 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Government  |x Governance  |x Government budgets  |x Government spending  |x Government health care finance  |x National health insurance 
650 4 |a Economics  |x Economic disciplines  |x Labor economics  |x Employment  |x Occupations  |x Medical personnel  |x Physicians 
650 4 |a Health sciences  |x Medical conditions  |x Disabilities 
650 4 |a Health sciences  |x Health care industry 
650 4 |a Health sciences  |x Health care industry  |x Health care administration  |x Health care finance  |x Health insurance 
650 4 |a Business  |x Industry  |x Industrial sectors  |x Service industries  |x Insurance industry  |x Insurance management 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Sociology  |x Human societies  |x Social welfare  |x Social work 
650 4 |a Health sciences  |x Health care industry  |x Health care facilities  |x Rehabilitation facilities 
655 4 |a research-article 
700 1 |a Durand, Marie-José  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Caillard, Jean-François  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Roquelaure, Yves  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Loisel, Patrick  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health  |d NOROSH Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and health, 1975  |g 41(2015), 3, Seite 223-233  |w (DE-627)350781230  |w (DE-600)2083318-0  |x 1795990X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:41  |g year:2015  |g number:3  |g pages:223-233 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/24466949  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_23 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_73 
912 |a GBV_ILN_74 
912 |a GBV_ILN_95 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_101 
912 |a GBV_ILN_105 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_151 
912 |a GBV_ILN_161 
912 |a GBV_ILN_170 
912 |a GBV_ILN_206 
912 |a GBV_ILN_213 
912 |a GBV_ILN_230 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_293 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_602 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2950 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4338 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4367 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 41  |j 2015  |e 3  |h 223-233