|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000caa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
JST102238774 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20240624110739.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
180522s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)JST102238774
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (JST)24395772
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Johnson, Adrienne
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Ecuador's National Interpretation of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO): Green-Grabbing through Green Certification?
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2014
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This paper analyzes a new collaborative 'green' governance arrangement known as the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) in Ecuador and how this space can be a new site of institutionalizing environmental policies that sanction cases of land dispossession and facilitate incentives for new forms of land enclosures. In Ecuador, the RSPO has emerged as a collaborative governance institution that aims to address the adverse social and environmental effects that can accompany legal and illegal land acquisitions for palm cultivation. The initiative involves a variety of 'stakeholders' and calls for actors to prioritize 'sustainability' as a non-negotiable condition for palm oil development. Increasingly, however, evidence suggests that instead of ameliorating inequalities in the palm oil industry, the RSPO is a mechanism that merely 'greens' an already 'shady' business. Furthermore, many point to the RSPO as establishing terrain for 'green grabbing' practices. This paper argues that certain disciplining processes that the RSPO regime promotes, such as land-titling schemes, exclusionary participation, and capitalist meeting culture, can further exacerbate social and environmental conflicts by structuring collaborative debate while establishing qualifying criteria that encloses upon certain opportunities for the future. These processes can increasingly structure policy and ultimately encourage and legitimize the material practice of green land acquisitions in Ecuador. Este estudio analiza un nuevo acuerdo de gobernanza colaborativa 'verde" conocido como la Mesa Redonda sobre Aceite de Palma Sostenible (RSPO) en Ecuador y cómo este espacio puede ser un nuevo sitio para la institucionalización de las políticas ambientales que sancionan los casos de despojo de tierras y facilitar incentivos para las nuevas formas de recintos de la tierra. En Ecuador, la RSPO se ha convertido en una institución de gobierno de colaboración que tiene como objetivo hacer frente a los efectos sociales y ambientales adversos que pueden acompañar a la adquisición de tierras legales e ilegales para el cultivo de palma. La iniciativa consiste en una variedad de 'partes interesadas' y llama a los actores para dar prioridad a la 'sostenibilidad' como una condición no-negociable para el desarrollo del aceite de palma. Cada vez más, sin embargo, la evidencia sugiere que en lugar de mejorar las desigualdades en la industria del aceite de palma, la RSPO es meramente un negocio que siempre ha estado en la sombra, pero ya es 'verde'. Además, muchos apuntan a la RSPO como el establecimiento de un terreno para prácticas de 'acaparamiento verde'. Este estudio sostiene que ciertos procesos de disciplina que el régimen RSPO promueve, como los planes para la titulación de tierras, la participación excluyente y la cultura capitalista de reunión, pueden exacerbar los conflictos sociales y ambientales mediante la estructuración del debate de colaboración al tiempo que establece los criterios de calificación que limitará ciertas oportunidades futuras. Estos procesos pueden, cada vez más, estructurar las políticas y en última instancia fomentar y legitimar la práctica material de la adquisición de tierras verdes en Ecuador.
|
| 540 |
|
|
|a Copyright © 2013 Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Biological sciences
|x Agriculture
|x Sustainable agriculture
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Business
|x Industry
|x Industrial sectors
|x Manufacturing industries
|x Fossil fuels industries
|x Oil industry
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Political science
|x Government
|x Public administration
|x Public policy
|x Environmental policy
|x Environmental certification
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Environmental studies
|x Environmental economics
|x Ecological economics
|x Ecological sustainability
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Biological sciences
|x Agriculture
|x Agricultural sciences
|x Agricultural geography
|x Agricultural land
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Social sciences
|x Development studies
|x Development theory
|x Sustainable development
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Applied sciences
|x Engineering
|x Energy engineering
|x Renewable energy
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Business
|x Business administration
|x Corporate governance
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Environmental studies
|x Environmental sciences
|x Natural resources
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Physical sciences
|x Earth sciences
|x Geography
|
| 655 |
|
4 |
|a research-article
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Journal of Latin American Geography
|d University of Texas Press
|g 13(2014), 3, Seite 183-204
|w (DE-627)470155019
|w (DE-600)2165332-X
|x 15485811
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:13
|g year:2014
|g number:3
|g pages:183-204
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/24395772
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_JST
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_11
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_20
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_22
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_24
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_31
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_39
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_40
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_60
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_62
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_63
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_65
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_70
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_100
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_110
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_120
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_206
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_285
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_374
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_702
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_1200
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2001
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2003
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2005
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2006
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2007
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2008
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2009
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2010
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2011
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2014
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2015
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2018
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2020
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2021
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2025
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2026
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2027
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2031
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2038
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2044
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2048
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2050
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2055
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2056
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2057
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2061
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2107
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2111
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2113
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2190
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2548
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2875
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2949
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2950
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4012
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4035
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4037
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4046
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4112
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4126
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4242
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4251
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4305
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4307
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4322
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4323
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4325
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4335
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4338
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4346
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4393
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4700
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 13
|j 2014
|e 3
|h 183-204
|