Working Themselves Impure: A Life Cycle Theory of Legal Theories

Prescriptive legal theories have a tendency to cannibalize themselves. As they develop into schools of thought, they become not only increasingly complicated but also increasingly compromised, by their own normative lights. Maturation breeds adulteration. The theories work themselves impure. This Ar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The University of Chicago Law Review. - The University of Chicago Law School. - 83(2016), 4, Seite 1819-1892
1. Verfasser: Kessler, Jeremy K. (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Pozen, David E.
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2016
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:The University of Chicago Law Review
Schlagworte:Law Political science Philosophy Education
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST099922347
003 DE-627
005 20240624082743.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170319s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)JST099922347 
035 |a (JST)44090007 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Kessler, Jeremy K.  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Working Themselves Impure: A Life Cycle Theory of Legal Theories 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Prescriptive legal theories have a tendency to cannibalize themselves. As they develop into schools of thought, they become not only increasingly complicated but also increasingly compromised, by their own normative lights. Maturation breeds adulteration. The theories work themselves impure. This Article identifies and diagnoses this evolutionary phenomenon. We develop a stylized model to explain the life cycle of certain particularly influential legal theories. We illustrate this life cycle through case studies of originalism, textualism, popular constitutionalism, and cost-benefit analysis, as well as a comparison with leading accounts of organizational and theoretical change in politics and science. And we argue that an appreciation of the life cycle counsels a reorientation of legal advocacy and critique. The most significant threats posed by a new legal theory do not come from its neglect of significant first-order values—the usual focus of criticism—for those values are apt to be incorporated into the theory. Rather, the deeper threats lie in the second-and third-order social, political, and ideological effects that the adulterated theory's persistence may foster down the line. 
540 |a © 2016 The University of Chicago 
650 4 |a Law  |x Jurisprudence 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Political philosophy  |x Political ideologies  |x Constitutionalism 
650 4 |a Law  |x Judicial system  |x Legal proceedings  |x Appellate court proceedings  |x Judicial review  |x Statutory interpretation  |x Textualism 
650 4 |a Law  |x Jurisprudence  |x Public law theory 
650 4 |a Philosophy  |x Applied philosophy  |x Social philosophy  |x Social criticism  |x Critical theory  |x Metanarratives  |x Normativity 
650 4 |a Law  |x Statutory law 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Political organizations  |x Political parties 
650 4 |a Law  |x Administrative law  |x Economic regulation 
650 4 |a Education  |x Formal education  |x Educational institutions  |x Schools  |x Colleges  |x Law schools 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Political philosophy  |x Political ideologies  |x Conservatism 
655 4 |a research-article 
700 1 |a Pozen, David E.  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The University of Chicago Law Review  |d The University of Chicago Law School  |g 83(2016), 4, Seite 1819-1892  |w (DE-627)341344222  |w (DE-600)2067131-3  |x 1939859X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:83  |g year:2016  |g number:4  |g pages:1819-1892 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/44090007  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_23 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_73 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_95 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_101 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_151 
912 |a GBV_ILN_152 
912 |a GBV_ILN_161 
912 |a GBV_ILN_206 
912 |a GBV_ILN_213 
912 |a GBV_ILN_230 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_293 
912 |a GBV_ILN_370 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_602 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2034 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2055 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2108 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2111 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2129 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2935 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2950 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4326 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4338 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4367 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4753 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 83  |j 2016  |e 4  |h 1819-1892