The allocation of ecosystem net primary productivity in tropical forests

The allocation of the net primary productivity (NPP) of an ecosystem between canopy, woody tissue and fine roots is an important descriptor of the functioning of that ecosystem, and an important feature to correctly represent in terrestrial ecosystem models. Here, we collate and analyse a global dat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences. - The Royal Society. - 366(2011), 1582, Seite 3225-3245
1. Verfasser: Malhi, Yadvinder (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Doughty, Christopher, Galbraith, David
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2011
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences
Schlagworte:Biological sciences Information science Physical sciences
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST092494269
003 DE-627
005 20240624013439.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 151228s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)JST092494269 
035 |a (JST)23076289 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Malhi, Yadvinder  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The allocation of ecosystem net primary productivity in tropical forests 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The allocation of the net primary productivity (NPP) of an ecosystem between canopy, woody tissue and fine roots is an important descriptor of the functioning of that ecosystem, and an important feature to correctly represent in terrestrial ecosystem models. Here, we collate and analyse a global dataset of NPP allocation in tropical forests, and compare this with the representation of NPP allocation in 13 terrestrial ecosystem models. On average, the data suggest an equal partitioning of allocation between all three main components (mean 34 ± 6% canopy, 39 ± 10% wood, 27 ± 11% fine roots), but there is substantial site-to-site variation in allocation to woody tissue versus allocation to fine roots. Allocation to canopy (leaves, flowers and fruit) shows much less variance. The mean allocation of the ecosystem models is close to the mean of the data, but the spread is much greater, with several models reporting allocation partitioning outside of the spread of the data. Where all main components of NPP cannot be measured, litterfall is a good predictor of overall NPP (r 2 = 0.83 for linear fit forced through origin), stem growth is a moderate predictor and fine root production a poor predictor. Across sites the major component of variation of allocation is a shifting allocation between wood and fine roots, with allocation to the canopy being a relatively invariant component of total NPP. This suggests the dominant allocation trade-off is a 'fine root versus wood' trade-off, as opposed to the expected 'root—shoot' trade-off; such a trade-off has recently been posited on theoretical grounds for old-growth forest stands. We conclude by discussing the systematic biases in estimates of allocation introduced by missing NPP components, including herbivory, large leaf litter and root exudates production. These biases have a moderate effect on overall carbon allocation estimates, but are smaller than the observed range in allocation values across sites. 
540 |a Copyright © 2011 The Royal Society 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Ecology  |x Population ecology  |x Synecology  |x Biocenosis  |x Plant communities  |x Forests  |x Tropical forests 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Ecology  |x Ecological modeling  |x Ecosystem models 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Botany  |x Plant ecology  |x Vegetation  |x Vegetation structure  |x Plant strata  |x Vegetation canopies  |x Forest canopy 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Ecology  |x Biomass 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Ecology  |x Population ecology  |x Synecology  |x Biocenosis  |x Plant communities  |x Forests  |x Rain forests  |x Tropical rain forests 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Ecology  |x Ecosystems  |x Terrestrial ecosystems 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Botany  |x Plant ecology  |x Forest ecology  |x Forest ecosystems 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Agriculture  |x Agricultural sciences  |x Agronomy  |x Soil science  |x Soils  |x Forest soils 
650 4 |a Information science  |x Data products  |x Datasets 
650 4 |a Physical sciences  |x Earth sciences  |x Geography  |x Geomorphology  |x Topography  |x Lowlands 
655 4 |a research-article 
700 1 |a Doughty, Christopher  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Galbraith, David  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences  |d The Royal Society  |g 366(2011), 1582, Seite 3225-3245  |w (DE-627)254635237  |w (DE-600)1462620-2  |x 09628436  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:366  |g year:2011  |g number:1582  |g pages:3225-3245 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/23076289  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_23 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_73 
912 |a GBV_ILN_74 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_95 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_101 
912 |a GBV_ILN_105 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_151 
912 |a GBV_ILN_161 
912 |a GBV_ILN_170 
912 |a GBV_ILN_213 
912 |a GBV_ILN_230 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_293 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_381 
912 |a GBV_ILN_602 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2943 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2946 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2951 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4338 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4367 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 366  |j 2011  |e 1582  |h 3225-3245