The levels of analysis revisited

The levels of analysis revisited

The term levels of analysis has been used in several ways: to distinguish between ultimate and proximate levels, to categorize different kinds of research questions and to differentiate levels of reductionism. Because questions regarding ultimate function and proximate mechanisms are logically disti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences. - The Royal Society. - 366(2011), 1574, Seite 2076-2085
1. Verfasser: MacDougall-Shackleton, Scott A. (VerfasserIn)
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2011
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences
Schlagworte:Physical sciences Biological sciences Behavioral sciences Philosophy
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST092492363
003 DE-627
005 20240624013418.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 151228s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)JST092492363 
035 |a (JST)23035474 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a MacDougall-Shackleton, Scott A.  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The levels of analysis revisited 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The term levels of analysis has been used in several ways: to distinguish between ultimate and proximate levels, to categorize different kinds of research questions and to differentiate levels of reductionism. Because questions regarding ultimate function and proximate mechanisms are logically distinct, I suggest that distinguishing between these two levels is the best use of the term. Integrating across levels in research has potential risks, but many benefits. Consideration at one level can help generate novel hypotheses at the other, define categories of behaviour and set criteria that must be addressed. Taking an adaptationist stance thus strengthens research on proximate mechanisms. Similarly, it is critical for researchers studying adaptation and function to have detailed knowledge of proximate mechanisms that may constrain or modulate evolutionary processes. Despite the benefits of integrating across ultimate and proximate levels, failure to clearly identify levels of analysis, and whether or not hypotheses are exclusive alternatives, can create false debates. Such non-alternative hypotheses may occur between or within levels, and are not limited to integrative approaches. In this review, I survey different uses of the term levels of analysis and the benefits of integration, and highlight examples of false debate within and between levels. The best integrative biology reciprocally uses ultimate and proximate hypotheses to generate a more complete understanding of behaviour. 
540 |a Copyright © 2011 The Royal Society 
650 4 |a Physical sciences  |x Physics  |x Acoustics  |x Bioacoustics  |x Animal sounds  |x Animal vocalization  |x Bird songs 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Evolutionary studies  |x Evolutionary biology  |x Evolution 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Psychology  |x Cognitive psychology  |x Memory 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Zoology  |x Animals  |x Birds  |x Songbirds 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Developmental biology  |x Reproduction  |x Sex  |x Sex linked differences 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Evolutionary studies  |x Evolutionary biology  |x Biological evolution 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Zoology  |x Animals  |x Female animals 
650 4 |a Philosophy  |x Metaphysics  |x Ontology  |x Monism  |x Reductionism 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Neuroscience  |x Behavioral neuroscience 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Genetics  |x Population genetics  |x Sex ratio 
655 4 |a research-article 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences  |d The Royal Society  |g 366(2011), 1574, Seite 2076-2085  |w (DE-627)254635237  |w (DE-600)1462620-2  |x 09628436  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:366  |g year:2011  |g number:1574  |g pages:2076-2085 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/23035474  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_23 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_73 
912 |a GBV_ILN_74 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_95 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_101 
912 |a GBV_ILN_105 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_151 
912 |a GBV_ILN_161 
912 |a GBV_ILN_170 
912 |a GBV_ILN_213 
912 |a GBV_ILN_230 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_293 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_381 
912 |a GBV_ILN_602 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2943 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2946 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2951 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4338 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4367 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 366  |j 2011  |e 1574  |h 2076-2085