Power and Concession in Computer-Mediated Negotiations: An Examination of First Offers

Negotiation is increasingly being conducted over computer media, such as e-mail and instant messaging, because of the potential for time savings and monetary benefits. However, these media can affect negotiators' behaviors as they engage in what is called concession making, which is a process b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:MIS Quarterly. - Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota. - 33(2009), 1, Seite 147-170
1. Verfasser: Johnson, Norman A. (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Cooper, Randolph B.
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2009
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:MIS Quarterly
Schlagworte:Computer-mediated negotiation instant messaging (IM) first offers power cooperation theory concession reciprocity norm Mathematics Behavioral sciences Law mehr... Information science Social sciences Business
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST092404804
003 DE-627
005 20240624012629.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 151228s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/20650282  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)JST092404804 
035 |a (JST)20650282 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Johnson, Norman A.  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Power and Concession in Computer-Mediated Negotiations: An Examination of First Offers 
264 1 |c 2009 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Negotiation is increasingly being conducted over computer media, such as e-mail and instant messaging, because of the potential for time savings and monetary benefits. However, these media can affect negotiators' behaviors as they engage in what is called concession making, which is a process by which they make offers that yield benefits to their opponents. In this paper, we focus on how and why conducting negotiations via computer media can affect this process, especially when negotiators have unequal power. Our research model is based on theories from the information systems, negotiation, and social psychology literatures. Via a laboratory experiment, we find that concessions made by the first individual to make an offer (the first mover) were not typically reciprocated by his/her negotiating opponent (the second mover). Thus, in the context of computer-mediated negotiation, it appears that second movers are, among other things, more likely to violate the well-established norm of reciprocity. This can result in significant disadvantages for the first mover, independent of power differences between negotiators. In addition, we find that, contrary to face-to-face negotiations, increased power of one negotiator resulted in his/her having less influence in terms of getting larger concessions from the other negotiator. In general, these findings support the notion that computer-mediated negotiation can be significantly different than face-to-face negotiation. 
540 |a Copyright 2009 Management Information Systems Research Center (MISRC) of the University of Minnesota 
650 4 |a Computer-mediated negotiation 
650 4 |a instant messaging (IM) 
650 4 |a first offers 
650 4 |a power 
650 4 |a cooperation theory 
650 4 |a concession 
650 4 |a reciprocity norm 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Applied mathematics  |x Statistics  |x Applied statistics  |x Inferential statistics  |x Expected values 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Leisure studies  |x Recreation  |x Games  |x Gambling  |x Lotteries 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Psychology  |x Social psychology  |x Interpersonal relations  |x Dyadic relations 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Psychology  |x Social psychology 
650 4 |a Law  |x Civil law  |x Civil remedies  |x Alternative dispute resolution  |x Mediation 
650 4 |a Information science  |x Data products  |x Datasets 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Pure mathematics  |x Algebra  |x Arithmetic mean 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Communications  |x Communications media 
650 4 |a Business  |x Business operations  |x Commerce  |x Business orders 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Communications  |x Negotiation  |x Bargaining  |x Research Article 
655 4 |a research-article 
700 1 |a Cooper, Randolph B.  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t MIS Quarterly  |d Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota  |g 33(2009), 1, Seite 147-170  |w (DE-627)341354597  |w (DE-600)2068190-2  |x 21629730  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2009  |g number:1  |g pages:147-170 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/20650282  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/20650282  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_23 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_32 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_95 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_101 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_138 
912 |a GBV_ILN_152 
912 |a GBV_ILN_187 
912 |a GBV_ILN_224 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2034 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2048 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2055 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2059 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2065 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2068 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2106 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2108 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2111 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2113 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2118 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2119 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2122 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2129 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2143 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2147 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2148 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2152 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2153 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2232 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2472 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2935 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2940 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2950 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4246 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4326 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4336 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4338 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 33  |j 2009  |e 1  |h 147-170