The Workshop of Being
Abstract Contrary to Peter Hare's claim that James was a natural realist, I argue that James was a radical empiricist. As James's pervasive use of ‘phenomena’ attests, his central insight and organizing theme of selective interest required such a ‘double-barreled’ term to signify the strea...
| Veröffentlicht in: | Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy. - Indiana University Press, 1965. - 46(2010), 1, Seite 60-66 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2010
|
| Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy |
| Schlagworte: | Interpretation Phenomenalism Realism William James Philosophy Behavioral sciences |