Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaptation

This paper defines user adaptation as the cognitive and behavioral efforts performed by users to cope with significant information technology events that occur in their work environment. Drawing on coping theory, we posit that users choose different adaptation strategies based on a combination of pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:MIS Quarterly. - Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota. - 29(2005), 3, Seite 493-524
1. Verfasser: Beaudry, Anne (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Pinsonneault, Alain
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2005
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:MIS Quarterly
Schlagworte:Coping theory User adaptation IT appropriation Individual performance Economics Applied sciences Behavioral sciences Business
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST058442170
003 DE-627
005 20240622043821.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 150325s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/25148693  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)JST058442170 
035 |a (JST)25148693 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Beaudry, Anne  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaptation 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper defines user adaptation as the cognitive and behavioral efforts performed by users to cope with significant information technology events that occur in their work environment. Drawing on coping theory, we posit that users choose different adaptation strategies based on a combination of primary appraisal (i.e., a user's assessment of the expected consequences of an IT event) and secondary appraisal (i.e., a user's assessment of his/her control over the situation). On that basis, we identify four adaptation strategies (benefits maximizing, benefits satisficing, disturbance handling, and self-preservation) which are hypothesized to result in three different individual-level outcomes: restoring emotional stability, minimizing the perceived threats of the technology, and improving user effectiveness and efficiency. A study of the adaptation behaviors of six account managers in two large North American banks provides preliminary support for our model. By explaining adaptation patterns based on users' initial appraisal and subsequent responses to an IT event, our model offers predictive power while retaining an agency view of user adaptation. Also, by focusing on user cognitive and behavioral adaptation responses related to the technology, the work system, and the self, our model accounts for a wide range of user behaviors such as technology appropriation, avoidance, and resistance. 
540 |a Copyright 2005 The Management Information Systems Research Center (MISRC) of the University of Minnesota 
650 4 |a Coping theory 
650 4 |a User adaptation 
650 4 |a IT appropriation 
650 4 |a Individual performance 
650 4 |a Economics  |x Economic disciplines  |x Financial economics  |x Banking  |x Banking services  |x Bank accounts 
650 4 |a Applied sciences  |x Computer science  |x Computer engineering  |x Computer technology  |x Information technology 
650 4 |a Economics  |x Economic disciplines  |x Financial economics  |x Finance  |x Financial management 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Psychology  |x Cognitive psychology  |x Emotion  |x Emotional stability 
650 4 |a Economics  |x Economic disciplines  |x Financial economics  |x Banking  |x Bank management 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Psychology  |x Cognitive psychology  |x Emotion  |x Emotional adjustment 
650 4 |a Business  |x Business administration  |x Business management 
650 4 |a Applied sciences  |x Computer science  |x Computer engineering  |x Computer software  |x Software applications  |x Information storage and retrieval systems 
650 4 |a Applied sciences  |x Technology  |x Technological change  |x Emerging technology 
650 4 |a Applied sciences  |x Technology  |x Environmental technology  |x Research Articles 
655 4 |a research-article 
700 1 |a Pinsonneault, Alain  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t MIS Quarterly  |d Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota  |g 29(2005), 3, Seite 493-524  |w (DE-627)341354597  |w (DE-600)2068190-2  |x 21629730  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:29  |g year:2005  |g number:3  |g pages:493-524 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/25148693  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/25148693  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_23 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_32 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_95 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_101 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_138 
912 |a GBV_ILN_152 
912 |a GBV_ILN_187 
912 |a GBV_ILN_224 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2034 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2048 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2055 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2059 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2065 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2068 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2106 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2108 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2111 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2113 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2118 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2119 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2122 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2129 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2143 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2147 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2148 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2152 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2153 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2232 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2472 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2935 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2940 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2950 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4246 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4326 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4336 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4338 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 29  |j 2005  |e 3  |h 493-524