|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01000caa a22002652 4500 |
001 |
JST056265506 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20240622021752.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
150324s2001 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)JST056265506
|
035 |
|
|
|a (JST)2661640
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Butler, John
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
2 |
|a A Multiple Attribute Utility Theory Approach to Ranking and Selection
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2001
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
520 |
|
|
|a Managers of large industrial projects often measure performance by multiple attributes. For example, our paper is motivated by the simulation of a large industrial project called a land seismic survey, in which project performance is based on duration, cost, and resource utilization. To address these types of problems, we develop a ranking and selection procedure for making comparisons of systems (e.g., project configurations) that have multiple performance measures. The procedure combines multiple attribute utility theory with statistical ranking and selection to select the best configuration from a set of possible configurations using the indifference-zone approach. We apply our procedure to results generated by the simulator for a land seismic survey that has six performance measures, and describe a particular type of sensitivity analysis that can be used as a robustness check.
|
540 |
|
|
|a Copyright 2001 INFORMS
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Simulation
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Ranking and Selection
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Multiple Attribute Utility Theory
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Business
|x Business administration
|x Business management
|x Performance management
|x Performance metrics
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Economics
|x Microeconomics
|x Economic utility
|x Utility functions
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Physical sciences
|x Earth sciences
|x Geography
|x Land surveying
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Behavioral sciences
|x Psychology
|x Cognitive psychology
|x Emotion
|x Emotional states
|x Ambivalence
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Business
|x Business administration
|x Business management
|x Management principles
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Business
|x Accountancy
|x Financial accounting
|x Business expenses
|x Fixed costs
|x Committed fixed costs
|x Occupancy costs
|x Utilities costs
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Applied sciences
|x Engineering
|x Transportation
|x Vehicles
|x Vehicle performance
|x Horsepower
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Applied sciences
|x Research methods
|x Modeling
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Mathematics
|x Applied mathematics
|x Mathematical modeling
|x Sensitivity analysis
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Economics
|x Microeconomics
|x Economic utility
|
655 |
|
4 |
|a research-article
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Morrice, Douglas J.
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Mullarkey, Peter W.
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Management Science
|d Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, 1954
|g 47(2001), 6, Seite 800-816
|w (DE-627)320623602
|w (DE-600)2023019-9
|x 15265501
|7 nnns
|
773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:47
|g year:2001
|g number:6
|g pages:800-816
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/2661640
|3 Volltext
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_JST
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_11
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_20
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_22
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_23
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_24
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_31
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_32
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_39
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_40
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_60
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_62
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_63
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_65
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_69
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_70
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_90
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_95
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_100
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_110
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_120
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_151
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_152
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_187
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_224
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_285
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_374
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_702
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2001
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2003
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2005
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2006
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2007
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2008
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2009
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2010
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2011
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2014
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2015
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2018
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2020
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2021
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2026
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2027
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2034
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2044
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2048
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2050
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2055
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2056
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2057
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2059
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2061
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2065
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2068
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2106
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2107
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2108
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2111
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2112
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2113
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2118
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2122
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2129
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2143
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2147
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2148
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2152
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2153
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2190
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2232
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2472
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2935
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2940
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2949
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_2950
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4012
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4035
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4037
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4046
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4112
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4125
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4126
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4242
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4246
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4249
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4251
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4305
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4306
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4307
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4313
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4322
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4323
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4324
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4325
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4326
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4335
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4338
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4346
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4393
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_4700
|
951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
952 |
|
|
|d 47
|j 2001
|e 6
|h 800-816
|