On the Borda-Kendall Consensus Method for Priority Ranking Problems

This paper investigates the Borda-Kendall method for the determination of a consensus ranking. It is shown that in the case of ties the method does not perform as claimed. A "minimum variance" method for determining the consensus ranking is proposed and its properties examined. It is shown...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Management Science. - Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, 1954. - 28(1982), 6, Seite 621-637
1. Verfasser:	Cook, Wade D. (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser:	Seiford, Lawrence M.
Format:	Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:	English
Veröffentlicht:	1982
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:	Management Science
Schlagworte:	Utility/Preference-Theory Utility/Preference-Scaling Integer Programming-Applications Behavioral sciences Mathematics Economics


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	JST056265425
003	DE-627
005	20240622021751.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	150324s1982 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
035			\|a (DE-627)JST056265425
035			\|a (JST)2631045
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Cook, Wade D. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a On the Borda-Kendall Consensus Method for Priority Ranking Problems
264		1	\|c 1982
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a This paper investigates the Borda-Kendall method for the determination of a consensus ranking. It is shown that in the case of ties the method does not perform as claimed. A "minimum variance" method for determining the consensus ranking is proposed and its properties examined. It is shown to be equivalent to the Borda-Kendall method if ties are not allowed. An algorithm to determine the "minimum variance" consensus ranking in the case of ties is described. Results obtained from the solution of problems of various sizes are discussed.
540			\|a Copyright 1982 The Institute of Management Sciences
650		4	\|a Utility/Preference-Theory
650		4	\|a Utility/Preference-Scaling
650		4	\|a Integer Programming-Applications
650		4	\|a Behavioral sciences \|x Sociology \|x Human societies \|x Social groups \|x Committees
650		4	\|a Mathematics \|x Pure mathematics \|x Arithmetic \|x Addition \|x Partial sums
650		4	\|a Mathematics \|x Pure mathematics \|x Linear algebra \|x Vector analysis \|x Mathematical vectors
650		4	\|a Mathematics \|x Pure mathematics \|x Geometry \|x Non Euclidean geometry \|x Hyperplanes
650		4	\|a Economics \|x Economic disciplines \|x Public economics \|x Public choice economics \|x Social choice
650		4	\|a Mathematics \|x Mathematical expressions \|x Mathematical functions \|x Mathematical permutation
650		4	\|a Mathematics \|x Mathematical objects
650		4	\|a Mathematics \|x Mathematical objects \|x Discriminants
650		4	\|a Economics \|x Economic disciplines \|x Labor economics \|x Employment \|x Occupations \|x Politicians \|x Political candidates
650		4	\|a Mathematics \|x Applied mathematics \|x Statistics \|x Applied statistics \|x Statistical results \|x Statistical properties \|x Estimate reliability
655		4	\|a research-article
700	1		\|a Seiford, Lawrence M. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Management Science \|d Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, 1954 \|g 28(1982), 6, Seite 621-637 \|w (DE-627)320623602 \|w (DE-600)2023019-9 \|x 15265501 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:28 \|g year:1982 \|g number:6 \|g pages:621-637
856	4	0	\|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/2631045 \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_JST
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_120
912			\|a GBV_ILN_152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_374
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2018
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2057
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2065
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2107
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2108
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2472
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2935
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2940
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2949
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2950
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4246
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4346
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 28 \|j 1982 \|e 6 \|h 621-637