Three New Tests of Independence That Differentiate Models of Risky Decision Making

This paper tests new "independence" properties to compare three models of risky decision making. According to the rank-affected multiplicative (RAM) weights model, all three properties should be satisfied; according to the transfer of attention exchange (TAX) model, two should be satisfied...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Management Science. - Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, 1954. - 51(2005), 9, Seite 1346-1358
1. Verfasser: Birnbaum, Michael H. (VerfasserIn)
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2005
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Management Science
Schlagworte:choice cumulative prospect theory decision making distribution independence expected utility paradoxes prospect theory rank-dependent utility Applied sciences Political science mehr... Mathematics Behavioral sciences Philosophy
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST056212054
003 DE-627
005 20240622020931.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 150324s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)JST056212054 
035 |a (JST)20110425 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Birnbaum, Michael H.  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Three New Tests of Independence That Differentiate Models of Risky Decision Making 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper tests new "independence" properties to compare three models of risky decision making. According to the rank-affected multiplicative (RAM) weights model, all three properties should be satisfied; according to the transfer of attention exchange (TAX) model, two should be satisfied and one can be violated. However, according to cumulative prospect theory (CPT), all three properties will be violated if the probability weighting function is nonlinear. Although CPT is flexible enough to accommodate violations of these properties, its predicted violations based on previously estimated parameters failed to materialize. In 14 choices for which the CPT model disagreed with TAX, CPT correctly predicted the modal choice in only one case and TAX predicted the modal choice in the other 13. New versions of three other paradoxes were also tested and found to refute CPT. 
540 |a Copyright 2005 INFORMS 
650 4 |a choice 
650 4 |a cumulative prospect theory 
650 4 |a decision making 
650 4 |a distribution independence 
650 4 |a expected utility 
650 4 |a paradoxes 
650 4 |a prospect theory 
650 4 |a rank-dependent utility 
650 4 |a Applied sciences  |x Research methods  |x Modeling 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Government  |x Governance  |x Taxation  |x Taxes  |x Ad valorem taxes  |x Property taxes 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Applied mathematics  |x Statistics  |x Applied statistics  |x Statistical models  |x Parametric models 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Mathematical expressions  |x Mathematical functions  |x Weighting functions 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Government  |x Public administration  |x Government bureaucracy  |x Government forms  |x Tax forms  |x W2 form 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Psychology  |x Cognitive psychology  |x Cognitive processes  |x Decision making  |x Decision analysis  |x Decision making models 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Behavioral economics  |x Prospect theory 
650 4 |a Philosophy  |x Logic  |x Paradoxes 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Applied mathematics  |x Management science 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Mathematical values  |x Mathematical variables  |x Mathematical independent variables 
650 4 |a Applied sciences  |x Research methods  |x Modeling 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Government  |x Governance  |x Taxation  |x Taxes  |x Ad valorem taxes  |x Property taxes 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Applied mathematics  |x Statistics  |x Applied statistics  |x Statistical models  |x Parametric models 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Mathematical expressions  |x Mathematical functions  |x Weighting functions 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Government  |x Public administration  |x Government bureaucracy  |x Government forms  |x Tax forms  |x W2 form 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Psychology  |x Cognitive psychology  |x Cognitive processes  |x Decision making  |x Decision analysis  |x Decision making models 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Behavioral economics  |x Prospect theory 
650 4 |a Philosophy  |x Logic  |x Paradoxes 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Applied mathematics  |x Management science 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Mathematical values  |x Mathematical variables  |x Mathematical independent variables 
655 4 |a research-article 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Management Science  |d Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, 1954  |g 51(2005), 9, Seite 1346-1358  |w (DE-627)320623602  |w (DE-600)2023019-9  |x 15265501  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:51  |g year:2005  |g number:9  |g pages:1346-1358 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/20110425  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_23 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_32 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_95 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_151 
912 |a GBV_ILN_152 
912 |a GBV_ILN_187 
912 |a GBV_ILN_224 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2034 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2048 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2055 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2059 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2065 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2068 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2106 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2108 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2111 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2113 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2118 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2122 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2129 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2143 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2147 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2148 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2152 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2153 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2232 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2472 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2935 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2940 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2950 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4246 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4326 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4338 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 51  |j 2005  |e 9  |h 1346-1358