Ice Storm Damage to Forest Tree Species in the Ridge and Valley Region of Southwestern Virginia

Ice damage to canopy trees was surveyed after a major ice storm on Virginia Tech's Fishburn Forest in the central Appalachian Mountain region The survey site was stratified according to aspect, slope, and slope position, and sample plots were randomly chosen within each topographic category In...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society. - Torrey Botanical Society, 1997. - 126(1999), 2, Seite 147-158
1. Verfasser: Warrillow, Michael (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Mou, Pu
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 1999
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society
Schlagworte:Ice Storm Damage Topographic Effect Tree Susceptibility Appalachian Forests Applied sciences Biological sciences Environmental studies Physical sciences
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST053611896
003 DE-627
005 20240621221856.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 150324s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/2997291  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)JST053611896 
035 |a (JST)2997291 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Warrillow, Michael  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Ice Storm Damage to Forest Tree Species in the Ridge and Valley Region of Southwestern Virginia 
264 1 |c 1999 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Ice damage to canopy trees was surveyed after a major ice storm on Virginia Tech's Fishburn Forest in the central Appalachian Mountain region The survey site was stratified according to aspect, slope, and slope position, and sample plots were randomly chosen within each topographic category In general, Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana Mill) and pitch pine (P rigida Mill) were the most damaged, and blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica Marsh.) was the most resistant species Although yellow buckeye (Aesculus octandra Marsh) and yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera L.) were basically undamaged, they were restricted to the topographic areas where ice damage was generally less severe Within a species, susceptibility varied according to topographic features In general, the greatest damage occurred on steep slopes and eastern aspects, and the least damage occurred on toeslopes (foothill and valley bottom) Some species, such as red maple, varied greatly in their susceptibility to ice damage between topographic categories, while others, like blackgum, varied little Dominant canopy individuals generally had less damage than co-dominant and intermediate individuals These results suggest that damage by ice storms is patchy at local scales, and that the distribution of damage may be predictable 
540 |a Copyright 1999 Torrey Botanical Society 
650 4 |a Ice Storm Damage 
650 4 |a Topographic Effect 
650 4 |a Tree Susceptibility 
650 4 |a Appalachian Forests 
650 4 |a Applied sciences  |x Materials science  |x Physical damage  |x Frost damage 
650 4 |a Applied sciences  |x Materials science  |x Physical damage  |x Storm damage 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Botany  |x Dendrology  |x Trees  |x Evergreen trees  |x Conifers  |x Pine trees 
650 4 |a Environmental studies  |x Atmospheric sciences  |x Meteorology  |x Meteorological phenomena  |x Storms  |x Ice storms 
650 4 |a Applied sciences  |x Materials science  |x Physical damage  |x Fire damage 
650 4 |a Physical sciences  |x Earth sciences  |x Geography  |x Geomorphology  |x Topography  |x Topographical aspect 
650 4 |a Physical sciences  |x Earth sciences  |x Geography  |x Geomorphology  |x Topography  |x Sloping terrain 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Botany  |x Dendrology  |x Trees 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Botany  |x Plant ecology  |x Vegetation  |x Vegetation structure  |x Plant strata  |x Vegetation canopies  |x Forest canopy 
650 4 |a Physical sciences  |x Earth sciences  |x Geography  |x Geomorphology  |x Landforms 
655 4 |a research-article 
700 1 |a Mou, Pu  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society  |d Torrey Botanical Society, 1997  |g 126(1999), 2, Seite 147-158  |w (DE-627)331744619  |w (DE-600)2052331-2  |x 19400616  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:126  |g year:1999  |g number:2  |g pages:147-158 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/2997291  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/2997291  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2939 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2942 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2946 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2951 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 126  |j 1999  |e 2  |h 147-158