Adaptive Fuzzy Logics for Contextual Hedge Interpretation

Adaptive Fuzzy Logics for Contextual Hedge Interpretation

The article presents several adaptive fuzzy hedge logics. These logics are designed to perform a specific kind of hedge detection. Given a premise set Γ that represents a series of communicated statements, the logics can check whether some predicate occurring in Γ may be interpreted as being (implic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Logic, Language, and Information. - Springer Science + Business Media. - 18(2009), 3, Seite 333-356
1. Verfasser: van der Waart van Gulik, Stephan (VerfasserIn)
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2009
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Journal of Logic, Language, and Information
Schlagworte:Hedges Fuzzy logic Adaptive logic Concepts Cognitive science Linguistics Mathematics Social sciences Philosophy Religion
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST049602306
003 DE-627
005 20240621165439.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 150324s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)JST049602306 
035 |a (JST)40345532 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a van der Waart van Gulik, Stephan  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Adaptive Fuzzy Logics for Contextual Hedge Interpretation 
264 1 |c 2009 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The article presents several adaptive fuzzy hedge logics. These logics are designed to perform a specific kind of hedge detection. Given a premise set Γ that represents a series of communicated statements, the logics can check whether some predicate occurring in Γ may be interpreted as being (implicitly) hedged by technically, strictly speaking or loosely speaking, or simply non-hedged. The logics take into account both the logical constraints of the premise set as well as conceptual information concerning the meaning of potentially hedged predicates (stored in the memory of the interpreter in question). The proof theory of the logics is non-monotonic in order to enable the logics to deal with possible non-monotonic interpretation dynamics (this is illustrated by means of several concrete proofs). All the adaptive fuzzy hedge logics are also sound and strongly complete with respect to their [0, 1]-semantics. 
540 |a Copyright 2009 Springer 
650 4 |a Hedges 
650 4 |a Fuzzy logic 
650 4 |a Adaptive logic 
650 4 |a Concepts 
650 4 |a Cognitive science 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Grammar  |x Grammatical constructions  |x Predicates 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Mathematical expressions  |x Mathematical functions 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Communications  |x Semiotics  |x Semantics 
650 4 |a Philosophy  |x Logic  |x Logical topics  |x Formal logic  |x Mathematical logic  |x Proof theory 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Communications  |x Speech 
650 4 |a Philosophy  |x Logic  |x Logical topics  |x Nonstandard logics  |x Paraconsistent logics  |x Adaptive logics 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Pure mathematics  |x Linear algebra  |x Vector analysis  |x Vector operations  |x Scalars 
650 4 |a Philosophy  |x Logic  |x Logical topics  |x Nonstandard logics  |x Many valued logics  |x Fuzzy logic 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Applied linguistics  |x Language translation 
650 4 |a Religion  |x Spiritual belief systems  |x Christianity  |x Protestantism  |x Quakers 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Grammar  |x Grammatical constructions  |x Predicates 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Mathematical expressions  |x Mathematical functions 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Communications  |x Semiotics  |x Semantics 
650 4 |a Philosophy  |x Logic  |x Logical topics  |x Formal logic  |x Mathematical logic  |x Proof theory 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Communications  |x Speech 
650 4 |a Philosophy  |x Logic  |x Logical topics  |x Nonstandard logics  |x Paraconsistent logics  |x Adaptive logics 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Pure mathematics  |x Linear algebra  |x Vector analysis  |x Vector operations  |x Scalars 
650 4 |a Philosophy  |x Logic  |x Logical topics  |x Nonstandard logics  |x Many valued logics  |x Fuzzy logic 
650 4 |a Linguistics  |x Applied linguistics  |x Language translation 
650 4 |a Religion  |x Spiritual belief systems  |x Christianity  |x Protestantism  |x Quakers 
655 4 |a research-article 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of Logic, Language, and Information  |d Springer Science + Business Media  |g 18(2009), 3, Seite 333-356  |w (DE-627)26953914X  |w (DE-600)1475526-9  |x 15729583  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:18  |g year:2009  |g number:3  |g pages:333-356 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/40345532  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_23 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_32 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_73 
912 |a GBV_ILN_74 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_95 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_101 
912 |a GBV_ILN_105 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_138 
912 |a GBV_ILN_150 
912 |a GBV_ILN_151 
912 |a GBV_ILN_152 
912 |a GBV_ILN_161 
912 |a GBV_ILN_170 
912 |a GBV_ILN_171 
912 |a GBV_ILN_187 
912 |a GBV_ILN_213 
912 |a GBV_ILN_224 
912 |a GBV_ILN_230 
912 |a GBV_ILN_250 
912 |a GBV_ILN_281 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_293 
912 |a GBV_ILN_370 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_602 
912 |a GBV_ILN_636 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2004 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2025 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2031 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2034 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2038 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2039 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2048 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2049 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2055 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2059 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2064 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2065 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2068 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2070 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2086 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2088 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2093 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2106 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2108 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2111 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2113 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2116 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2118 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2119 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2122 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2129 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2143 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2144 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2147 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2148 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2152 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2153 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2188 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2232 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2336 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2446 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2470 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2472 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2507 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2522 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2548 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2937 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2950 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4246 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4326 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4328 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4333 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4334 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4336 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4338 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 18  |j 2009  |e 3  |h 333-356