The Troubled History of Partition
The Dayton accord reached in November 1995 was something historically familiar: a partition agreement. As in Bosnia today, partition has usually arisen not as a means of national self-determination but as a way for great powers to "divide and quit." Often described as the only workable sol...
| Veröffentlicht in: | Foreign Affairs. - Council on Foreign Relations. - 76(1997), 1, Seite 22-34 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
1997
|
| Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Foreign Affairs |
| Schlagworte: | Behavioral sciences Political science Social sciences History Law |
| Zusammenfassung: | The Dayton accord reached in November 1995 was something historically familiar: a partition agreement. As in Bosnia today, partition has usually arisen not as a means of national self-determination but as a way for great powers to "divide and quit." Often described as the only workable solution to ethnic feuding, partitions have in fact generally fomented violence and required further international intervention. Similar conditions ensure that Bosnia will turn into a policy of divide and be forced to stay. Had outside powers worked from the beginning to reintegrate the fractured country, Bosnia, the Balkans, and Europe might have had a more durable resolution. The Dayton agreement should evoke memories not of Munich but of Cyprus. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00157120 |
| DOI: | 10.2307/20047907 |