Agricultural Labourers, the State and Agrarian Transition in Uttar Pradesh

It is fallacious to conceptualise the differences in agricultural scenario of east and west Uttar Pradesh in terms of 'semi-feudal stagnation' and 'capitalist agrarian development', respectively, equating the former with the prevalence of strong oppressive structures. Rather, the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Economic and Political Weekly. - Sameeksha Trust, 1966. - 33(1998), 13, Seite A29-A35
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 1998
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Economic and Political Weekly
Schlagworte:Economics Biological sciences Social sciences Law Philosophy Behavioral sciences
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST029632218
003 DE-627
005 20240620180222.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 150324s1998 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)JST029632218 
035 |a (JST)4406581 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
245 1 0 |a Agricultural Labourers, the State and Agrarian Transition in Uttar Pradesh 
264 1 |c 1998 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a It is fallacious to conceptualise the differences in agricultural scenario of east and west Uttar Pradesh in terms of 'semi-feudal stagnation' and 'capitalist agrarian development', respectively, equating the former with the prevalence of strong oppressive structures. Rather, the post-independence land reforms have resulted in a split in the landowning class between the erstwhile thakur landlords and upcoming OBC peasantry, in east UP, thus providing space for the dalits to assert themselves in alliance with the OBCs. On the other hand, the capitalist development in west UP has maintained the monopoly of numerically stronger jats on landownership, thus negating any changes in rural social relations. 
650 4 |a Economics  |x Economic disciplines  |x Labor economics  |x Labor  |x Workforce 
650 4 |a Economics  |x Economic theory  |x Capitalism 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Agriculture 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Development studies  |x Agricultural development 
650 4 |a Law  |x Civil law  |x Land law  |x Land ownership  |x Landowners 
650 4 |a Economics  |x Economic disciplines  |x Agricultural economics  |x Capitalist agriculture 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Human geography  |x Housing  |x Tenancy  |x Landlords 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Development studies  |x Development economics  |x Economic development 
650 4 |a Philosophy  |x Applied philosophy  |x Social philosophy  |x Social criticism  |x Critical theory  |x Interactionism  |x Social power  |x Power structures  |x Oppression 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Sociology  |x Human societies  |x Social structures  |x Social stratification  |x Social classes  |x Lower class  |x Peasant class  |x Review of Agriculture, March 1998 
655 4 |a research-article 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Economic and Political Weekly  |d Sameeksha Trust, 1966  |g 33(1998), 13, Seite A29-A35  |w (DE-627)360058949  |w (DE-600)2098679-8  |x 23498846  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:1998  |g number:13  |g pages:A29-A35 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/4406581  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_26 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_101 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_187 
912 |a GBV_ILN_206 
912 |a GBV_ILN_224 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2111 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2548 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2937 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2941 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2950 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 33  |j 1998  |e 13  |h A29-A35