| Zusammenfassung: | Using a variation on an experimental approach from biology, we distinguish the influence of sociocultural factors from that of economic, demographic, and ecological factors in environmental management and maintenance. This is important to issues of global environmental change, where there is little empirical research into cultural effects on deforestation and land use. Findings with three groups who live in the same rainforest habitat and manifest strikingly distinct behaviors, cognitions, and social relations relative to the forest indicate that rational selfinterest and institutional constraints may not by themselves account for commons behavior and cultural patternings of cognition are significant. Only the areas last native Itza Maya (who have few cooperative institutions) show systematic awareness of ecological complexity involving animals, plants, and people and practices clearly favoring forest regeneration. Spanishspeaking immigrants prove closer to native Maya in thought, action, and social networking than immigrant Qeqchi Maya (who have highly cooperative institutions). The role of spiritual values and the limitations of rational, utilitybased decision theories are explored. Emergent cultural patterns derived statistically from measurements of individual cognitions and behaviors suggest that cultural transmission and formation consist not primarily of shared rules or norms but of complex distributions of causally connected representations across minds.
|
|---|
| Beschreibung: | 1 We thank the people of San Jos, La Nueva, and Corozal for their gracious reception and collaboration. Nicole Berry helped with data collection, Ximena Lois with transcriptions, and Sergey Blok with figures. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (SBR 9422587, SES9981762) and the Russell Sage Foundation (879902). A report of initial findings appeared in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. (Atran et al. 1999 ), with some of the data reported here. Errors in tables 3 and 4 (but not in data analyses) are corrected here. Residual analyses also had errors in presentation (but not results) that are here clarified and amplified. [Supplementary materials appear in the electronic edition of this issue on the journals web page ( http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CA/home.html ).] |
|---|