Jumping mechanisms and performance in beetles. II. Weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Rhamphini)

We describe the kinematics and performance of the natural jump in the weevil Orchestes fagi (Fabricius, 1801) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and its jumping apparatus with underlying anatomy and functional morphology. In weevils, jumping is performed by the hind legs and involves the extension of the h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ventricular Restraint Improves Outcomes in HF Patients with CRT. - 2011. - Amsterdam [u.a.]
1. Verfasser: Nadein, Konstantin (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Betz, Oliver (BerichterstatterIn)
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2018transfer abstract
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Ventricular Restraint Improves Outcomes in HF Patients with CRT
Schlagworte:Locomotion Coleoptera Functional morphology Resilin Kinematics Jump
Umfang:13
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 ELV04240455X
003 DE-627
005 20230626001322.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180726s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.asd.2018.02.006  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a GBV00000000000172A.pica 
035 |a (DE-627)ELV04240455X 
035 |a (ELSEVIER)S1467-8039(18)30021-5 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
082 0 |a 590 
082 0 4 |a 590  |q DE-600 
082 0 4 |a 610  |q VZ 
082 0 4 |a 670  |q VZ 
084 |a 51.75  |2 bkl 
100 1 |a Nadein, Konstantin  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Jumping mechanisms and performance in beetles. II. Weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Rhamphini) 
264 1 |c 2018transfer abstract 
300 |a 13 
336 |a nicht spezifiziert  |b zzz  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a nicht spezifiziert  |b z  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a nicht spezifiziert  |b zu  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a We describe the kinematics and performance of the natural jump in the weevil Orchestes fagi (Fabricius, 1801) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and its jumping apparatus with underlying anatomy and functional morphology. In weevils, jumping is performed by the hind legs and involves the extension of the hind tibia. The principal structural elements of the jumping apparatus are (1) the femoro-tibial joint, (2) the metafemoral extensor tendon, (3) the extensor ligament, (4) the flexor ligament, (5) the tibial flexor sclerite and (6) the extensor and flexor muscles. The kinematic parameters of the jump (from minimum to maximum) are 530–1965 m s−2 (acceleration), 0.7–2.0 m s−1 (velocity), 1.5–3.0 ms (time to take-off), 0.3–4.4 μJ (kinetic energy) and 54–200 (g-force). The specific joint power as calculated for the femoro-tibial joint during the jumping movement is 0.97 W g−1. The full extension of the hind tibia during the jump was reached within up to 1.8–2.5 ms. The kinematic parameters, the specific joint power and the time for the full extension of the hind tibia suggest that the jump is performed via a catapult mechanism with an input of elastic strain energy. A resilin-bearing elastic extensor ligament that connects the extensor tendon and the tibial base is considered to be the structure that accumulates the elastic strain energy for the jump. According to our functional model, the extensor ligament is loaded by the contraction of the extensor muscle, while the co-contraction of the antagonistic extensor and flexor muscles prevents the early extension of the tibia. This is attributable to the leverage factors of the femoro-tibial joint providing a mechanical advantage for the flexor muscles over the extensor muscles in the fully flexed position. The release of the accumulated energy is performed by the rapid relaxation of the flexor muscles resulting in the fast extension of the hind tibia propelling the body into air. 
520 |a We describe the kinematics and performance of the natural jump in the weevil Orchestes fagi (Fabricius, 1801) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and its jumping apparatus with underlying anatomy and functional morphology. In weevils, jumping is performed by the hind legs and involves the extension of the hind tibia. The principal structural elements of the jumping apparatus are (1) the femoro-tibial joint, (2) the metafemoral extensor tendon, (3) the extensor ligament, (4) the flexor ligament, (5) the tibial flexor sclerite and (6) the extensor and flexor muscles. The kinematic parameters of the jump (from minimum to maximum) are 530–1965 m s−2 (acceleration), 0.7–2.0 m s−1 (velocity), 1.5–3.0 ms (time to take-off), 0.3–4.4 μJ (kinetic energy) and 54–200 (g-force). The specific joint power as calculated for the femoro-tibial joint during the jumping movement is 0.97 W g−1. The full extension of the hind tibia during the jump was reached within up to 1.8–2.5 ms. The kinematic parameters, the specific joint power and the time for the full extension of the hind tibia suggest that the jump is performed via a catapult mechanism with an input of elastic strain energy. A resilin-bearing elastic extensor ligament that connects the extensor tendon and the tibial base is considered to be the structure that accumulates the elastic strain energy for the jump. According to our functional model, the extensor ligament is loaded by the contraction of the extensor muscle, while the co-contraction of the antagonistic extensor and flexor muscles prevents the early extension of the tibia. This is attributable to the leverage factors of the femoro-tibial joint providing a mechanical advantage for the flexor muscles over the extensor muscles in the fully flexed position. The release of the accumulated energy is performed by the rapid relaxation of the flexor muscles resulting in the fast extension of the hind tibia propelling the body into air. 
650 7 |a Locomotion  |2 Elsevier 
650 7 |a Coleoptera  |2 Elsevier 
650 7 |a Functional morphology  |2 Elsevier 
650 7 |a Resilin  |2 Elsevier 
650 7 |a Kinematics  |2 Elsevier 
650 7 |a Jump  |2 Elsevier 
700 1 |a Betz, Oliver  |4 oth 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |n Elsevier Science  |t Ventricular Restraint Improves Outcomes in HF Patients with CRT  |d 2011  |g Amsterdam [u.a.]  |w (DE-627)ELV015921530 
773 1 8 |g volume:47  |g year:2018  |g number:2  |g pages:131-143  |g extent:13 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2018.02.006  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_U 
912 |a GBV_ELV 
912 |a SYSFLAG_U 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_21 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_26 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_49 
912 |a GBV_ILN_50 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_72 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_130 
912 |a GBV_ILN_131 
912 |a GBV_ILN_179 
912 |a GBV_ILN_227 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
912 |a GBV_ILN_618 
912 |a GBV_ILN_694 
912 |a GBV_ILN_697 
912 |a GBV_ILN_807 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2019 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2023 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2124 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2156 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2208 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2469 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2470 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2505 
936 b k |a 51.75  |j Verbundwerkstoffe  |j Schichtstoffe  |q VZ 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 47  |j 2018  |e 2  |h 131-143  |g 13 
953 |2 045F  |a 590