Factors associated with Prolonged Inaction in the hypoglycaemic treatment in people with non-insulin dependent Type 2 Diabetes and elevated glycated haemoglobin: A registry-based cohort study
• Prolonged Inaction (PI) is defined as the absence of antidiabetic treatment adjustments in spite of indications based on patients’ HbA1c values. • PI which is the sum of ‘True’ and ‘False’ Clinical Inertia is useful to evaluate patients’ trajectories based on routinely collected data. • PI in prim...
| Veröffentlicht in: | A pilot randomized controlled trial examining the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of Adapted Motivational Interviewing for post-operative bariatric surgery patients. - 2016. - Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Weitere Verfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2017transfer abstract
|
| Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | A pilot randomized controlled trial examining the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of Adapted Motivational Interviewing for post-operative bariatric surgery patients |
| Schlagworte: | Clinical Inertia Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Retrospective cohort study Oral anti-diabetic treatment |
| Umfang: | 8 |
| Zusammenfassung: | • Prolonged Inaction (PI) is defined as the absence of antidiabetic treatment adjustments in spite of indications based on patients’ HbA1c values. • PI which is the sum of ‘True’ and ‘False’ Clinical Inertia is useful to evaluate patients’ trajectories based on routinely collected data. • PI in primary care is associated with both outcome indicators (lower values HbA1c values) and process indicators (higher frequency in the follow-up). • The trigger to initiate antidiabetic treatment changes in ‘real practice’ remains 7.5% or even 8%, instead of 7%. • Co-morbidities interact in a complex way, eitherer fostering PI (e.g. CKD) or fostering treatment intensification (e.g. depression). • Prolonged Inaction (PI) is defined as the absence of antidiabetic treatment adjustments in spite of indications based on patients’ HbA1c values. • PI which is the sum of ‘True’ and ‘False’ Clinical Inertia is useful to evaluate patients’ trajectories based on routinely collected data. • PI in primary care is associated with both outcome indicators (lower values HbA1c values) and process indicators (higher frequency in the follow-up). • The trigger to initiate antidiabetic treatment changes in ‘real practice’ remains 7.5% or even 8%, instead of 7%. • Co-morbidities interact in a complex way, eitherer fostering PI (e.g. CKD) or fostering treatment intensification (e.g. depression). |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | 8 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.pcd.2017.05.008 |