Frieden zwischen religiöser und säkularer Deutung, 1555–1700

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Handbuch Frieden im Europa der Frühen Neuzeit. - Berlin : De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2021. - (2021), Seite 43-61
1. Verfasser: Beiderbeck, Friedrich (VerfasserIn)
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:German
Veröffentlicht: 2021
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Handbuch Frieden im Europa der Frühen Neuzeit
LEADER 01000naa a2200265 4500
001 1818889307
003 DE-627
005 20221013124930.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221013s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c
035 |a (DE-627)1818889307 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1818889307 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a ger 
100 1 |a Beiderbeck, Friedrich  |e verfasserin  |0 (DE-588)1078120218  |0 (DE-627)838000614  |0 (DE-576)448949032  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Frieden zwischen religiöser und säkularer Deutung, 1555–1700  |c Friedrich Beiderbeck 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Handbuch Frieden im Europa der Frühen Neuzeit  |d Berlin : De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2021  |g (2021), Seite 43-61  |h 1 Online-Ressource (XLVII, 1083 Seiten)  |w (DE-627)1744322902  |z 9783110591316  |z 9783110588750  |7 nnnm 
773 1 8 |g year:2021  |g pages:43-61 
856 4 0 |u https://www-1degruyter-1com-12jv2xha20ba7.hanproxy.gwlb.de/document/doi/10.1515/9783110591316-003/html  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_U 
912 |a GBV_ILN_613 
912 |a SYSFLAG_1 
912 |a GBV_KXP 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_21 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_23 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_34 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_72 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_122 
912 |a GBV_ILN_130 
912 |a GBV_ILN_140 
912 |a GBV_ILN_147 
912 |a GBV_ILN_264 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
912 |a GBV_ILN_370 
912 |a GBV_ILN_496 
912 |a GBV_ILN_597 
912 |a GBV_ILN_697 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2019 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2045 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2063 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2118 
936 u w |j 2021  |h 43-61 
951 |a AR 
952 |j 2021  |h 43-61 
980 |2 613  |1 01  |x 4613  |b 4196975488  |y x  |z 13-10-22 
982 |2 613  |1 00  |x 4613  |8 00  |0 (DE-627)620022418  |a Reunion der Konfessionen 
982 |2 613  |1 00  |x 4613  |8 01  |0 (DE-627)615113435  |a Frieden 
983 |2 613  |1 00  |x 4613  |8 00  |0 (DE-627)614596335  |a 4.15  |b Theologie, Religionsphilosophie 
983 |2 613  |1 00  |x 4613  |8 01  |0 (DE-627)614596092  |a 4.2  |b Kirchenpolitik 
986 |2 613  |1 00  |x 4613  |a abs  |b Abstract: Religious and Secular Interpretations of Peace, 1555-1700 Early modern understandings of peace were shaped by the differentiation and pluralization of public life. Ecclesiastical-theological authority lost ground to growing state power. The necessity of religious coexistence promoted the expansion of the state monopoly on the use of force. Between 1555 and 1700, ideas of peace often implied nonviolence and security, unity and coexistence as state-guaranteed services. This reflected two significant shifts: the end of the unity of peace and faith and the transformation of eschatological expectations into a worldly concept of peace. The fact that government assumed responsibility for peace did not make religion redundant as a way of understanding peace. The experience of confessional violence fostered irenic and tolerant ideas, which envisaged interdenominational understanding as the foundation of peace. The demand for general tolerance proved to be utopian, however; state offered at least limited forms of coexistence. - Zu Leibniz S. 55 ff. 
989 |2 613  |1 00  |x 4613  |a Abstract: Religious and Secular Interpretations of Peace, 1555-1700 Early modern understandings of peace were shaped by the differentiation and pluralization of public life. Ecclesiastical-theological authority lost ground to growing state power. The necessity of religious coexistence promoted the expansion of the state monopoly on the use of force. Between 1555 and 1700, ideas of peace often implied nonviolence and security, unity and coexistence as state-guaranteed services. This reflected two significant shifts: the end of the unity of peace and faith and the transformation of eschatological expectations into a worldly concept of peace. The fact that government assumed responsibility for peace did not make religion redundant as a way of understanding peace. The experience of confessional violence fostered irenic and tolerant ideas, which envisaged interdenominational understanding as the foundation of peace. The demand for general tolerance proved to be utopian, however; state offered at least limited forms of coexistence. - Zu Leibniz S. 55 ff.