Muslims as "Hui" in Late Imperial and Republican China : A Historical Reconsideration of Social Differentiation and Identity Construction

As a minority in China, Muslims have had to deal with a twofold problem: maintaining the boundary of their group and integrating into larger society. The various responses to this problem in different contexts and under different circumstances are evident in various group identity configurations. Ba...

Description complète

Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Historical social research. - Mannheim : GESIS, 1979. - 44(2019), 3, Seite 226-263
Auteur principal: Lee, Yee Lak Elliot (Auteur)
Format: Article en ligne
Langue:English
Publié: 2019
Accès à la collection:Historical social research
Sujets:China Diskursanalyse Ethnizität Funktionsanalyse Identitätsbildung Islam Luhmann Minderheit Minderheitenpolitik N. plus... Nationalstaat Religiosität Säkularisierung Textanalyse cultural identity discourse analysis ethnicity functional analysis historical analysis historische Analyse identity formation kulturelle Identität minority minority policy nation state religiousness secularization social differentiation soziale Differenzierung text analysis
Description
Résumé:As a minority in China, Muslims have had to deal with a twofold problem: maintaining the boundary of their group and integrating into larger society. The various responses to this problem in different contexts and under different circumstances are evident in various group identity configurations. Based on Stausberg, it is proposed that the ways the identities are constructed refer to the dynamics of various types of social differentiation. The author argues that there were divergent identity configurations among Muslim elites regarding their identity sign Huihui in late imperial and post-imperial China, with the former constructed in the direction of religiosity and the latter in the direction of secularity. In the concluding remark, the author suggests a theoretical account of his empirical observation by drawing on elements of Luhmann’s theory of social differentiation.
ISSN:2366-6846
DOI:10.12759/hsr.44.2019.3.226-263