A Longitudinal NMR-Based Metabolomics Highlights Shared Mechanisms of Pathophysiology in ARDS Patients With and Without Sepsis

© 2025 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC. - 1985. - (2025) vom: 04. Sept.
Auteur principal: Singh, Anamika (Auteur)
Autres auteurs: Siddiqui, Mohd Adnan, Azim, Afzal, Sinha, Neeraj
Format: Article en ligne
Langue:English
Publié: 2025
Accès à la collection:Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC
Sujets:Journal Article 1H acute respiratory distress syndrome comorbidity metabolomics nuclear magnetic resonance pathophysiology sepsis serum
Description
Résumé:© 2025 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition often complicated by sepsis, leading to worse clinical outcomes. The role of biomarkers in distinguishing ARDS with and without sepsis remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in serum metabolites between the two groups, comparing levels on Day 1 and Day 7 of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and to assess the variation in outcomes via clinical characteristics. A cohort of n = 151 patients was included, with n = 91 providing serum samples on Day 1 and n = 60 on Day 7. Of the n = 91 patients on Day 1, n = 40 had ARDS with sepsis and n = 51 without sepsis, while on Day 7, n = 24 had ARDS with sepsis and n = 36 without. Serum samples were analyzed using 1H NMR-based metabolomics to identify altered metabolites and perturbed pathways. In contrast, no significant differences were found between the patient groups with and without sepsis on either Day 1 or Day 7. Mortality rates were also similar in both groups, with a 50% survival rate on Day 7. No notable differences in the clinical data were observed. These findings suggest that ARDS, with and without sepsis, exhibits a similar metabolic profile, likely due to shared pathophysiological mechanisms. In light of these similarities, the findings indicate a unified approach to ARDS management that may improve the clinical outcomes across both groups
Description:Date Revised 04.09.2025
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status Publisher
ISSN:1097-458X
DOI:10.1002/mrc.70032