Equity and empowerment effects : Multiple styles of 'voluntarism' in community-based health projects

© 2023 The Author(s).

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World development. - 1999. - 174(2024) vom: 30. Feb., Seite 106448
1. Verfasser: Nichols, Carly (VerfasserIn)
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:World development
Schlagworte:Journal Article Ethics Gender Nutrition Self-help groups South Asia Volunteering
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM367942186
003 DE-627
005 20240203232034.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240202s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106448  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1279.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM367942186 
035 |a (NLM)38304852 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Nichols, Carly  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Equity and empowerment effects  |b Multiple styles of 'voluntarism' in community-based health projects 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 03.02.2024 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2023 The Author(s). 
520 |a Community health workers (CHW) are individuals with no formal health training who perform various roles to address health disparities. There are long-sustained debates over how different forms of incentives shape CHW programs, which are often staffed with volunteer or minimally remunerated women. These debates are complicated by the diversity of CHW roles and contexts in which they work. Evidence is particularly scant around "change-agent" style CHWs, who shape health knowledge and norms within their community. This paper addresses this gap through an analysis of a change agent-staffed program that provided nutrition participatory education through women's groups in three eastern Indian sites. We examine how contextual factors across sites shaped change-agent management, and analyze the implications of each approach for efficacy, empowerment, and equity. Analyzing 68 interviews and 10 focus groups this study advances a typology of 'varieties' of voluntarism that we name laissez faire, active-cultivation, and honorarium-accountability, and uses comparative analysis to examine the equity and empowerment effects within selection, management, and payment. First, we find tensions in the community-based selection of volunteers because rather than selecting highly motivated women, groups selected women in the most favorable socioeconomic position to volunteer. Second, there is a tension around responsibility and expectations in that greater training and responsibility leads women to see more psychosocial empowerment (e.g., knowledge, confidence), but also may create more 'costs' to participation and leads to wider economic inequities in change-agent ranks. Third, we observe a misplaced focus on payments as central to change-agent motivation. While the two volunteer-only sites see payment as 'the answer' to motivation problems, the honorarium site sees payments as 'the problem' because they attract less intrinsically motivated individuals. We conclude that while payments may not make an unmotivated volunteer into a motivated one, this analysis suggests payments would potentially allow more marginalized women to participate, which may be key to making more equitable and efficacious impacts 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a Gender 
650 4 |a Nutrition 
650 4 |a Self-help groups 
650 4 |a South Asia 
650 4 |a Volunteering 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t World development  |d 1999  |g 174(2024) vom: 30. Feb., Seite 106448  |w (DE-627)NLM098143271  |x 0305-750X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:174  |g year:2024  |g day:30  |g month:02  |g pages:106448 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106448  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 174  |j 2024  |b 30  |c 02  |h 106448