Impact of probiotics on the lung development of Bama minipig after premature birth

Objectives: To examine the impact of probiotics on the lung development of preterm birth of Bama pig. Methods: From April 2020 to October 2021, this animal experimental research was performed by setting up preterm (birth at gestation 104 d), full-term (birth at gestation 113 d), preterm with probiot...

Description complète

Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of pediatrics. - 1960. - 60(2022), 4 vom: 02. Apr., Seite 297-301
Auteur principal: Xie, L (Auteur)
Autres auteurs: Yang, S, Zhou, D, Chen, T T, Zhang, Y, Lu, J, Wang, Q, Shi, F, Liu, Y, Fu, H L, Liu, H M
Format: Article en ligne
Langue:Chinese
Publié: 2022
Accès à la collection:Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of pediatrics
Sujets:Journal Article
LEADER 01000caa a22002652c 4500
001 NLM339156791
003 DE-627
005 20250303054022.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||chi c
024 7 |a 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20211231-01096  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n1130.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM339156791 
035 |a (NLM)35385933 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a chi 
100 1 |a Xie, L  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Impact of probiotics on the lung development of Bama minipig after premature birth 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 08.04.2022 
500 |a Date Revised 08.04.2022 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a Objectives: To examine the impact of probiotics on the lung development of preterm birth of Bama pig. Methods: From April 2020 to October 2021, this animal experimental research was performed by setting up preterm (birth at gestation 104 d), full-term (birth at gestation 113 d), preterm with probiotics (birth at gestation 104 d treated with probiotics given at 3 d after birth), and full-term with probiotics (birth at gestation 113 d treated with probiotics given at 3 d after birth) groups and using the preterm Bama minipig model, the body weights were recorded and lung, ileum, and intestinal content samples were collected at birth, 4 days, 9 days, and 21 days after births of the piglets in preterm and full-term groups, the same samples were collected on 9 days after births of the piglets in preterm with probiotics and full-term with probiotics groups. The body weight and radial alveolar counts (RAC) were compared to evaluate the lung development of the piglets. The lengths of ileal villus were compared to evaluate the development of ileum. The composition structures of bacteria in ileum were analyzed by 16 S rRNA sequencing. The statistical analyses between different groups were performed by t test. Results: There were totally 30 piglets (16 female piglets and 14 male piglets) involving 12 piglets in preterm and full-term groups respectively and 3 piglets in preterm with probiotics and full-term with probiotics groups respectively. The body weights of the piglets in preterm group were lower than those in full-term group at 4, 9 and 21 d after birth ((507±27) vs. (694±56) g, (620±35) vs. (1 092±154) g, (1 660±210) vs. (2 960±418) g,t=2.96, 2.99, 2.78, all P<0.05). The alveolarization of the preterm piglets at 9 days after birth was significantly lower than that of the full-term piglets at the equivalent time point (4.00±0.29 vs. 6.11±0.35, t=4.64, P<0.01). The bacteria genus with the highest abundance in ileum were all different between the preterm and the full-term groups at 4, 9 and 21 d after birth (4 d Escherichia-Shigella (26.63%) and Enterococcus (30.48%) respectively;9 d Turicibacter (35.94%) and Lactobacillus (27.33%) respectively;21 d Escherichia-Shigella (28.02%) and Lactobacillus (46.29%) respectively). The heights of ileal villus of the preterm piglets at 9 d after birth were significantly lower than those of the full-term minipigs at the equivalent time point ((297±21) vs. (411±32) μm, t=3.01, P=0.007).There were both no differences in the body weight and alveolarization ((692±36) vs. (767±67) g, 5.44±0.34 vs. 5.89±0.26, t=0.74, 1.04, both P>0.05) between the piglets in preterm with probiotics group and those in full-term with probiotics group. Turicibacter was the dominant genus in the piglets of both preterm with probiotics and the full-term with probiotics groups. The heights of ileal villus of the piglets in preterm with probiotics group were significantly longer that those of the piglets in preterm group ((371±13) vs. (297±21) μm, t=3.04, P=0.006), and were both not significantly different from those of the piglets in full-term with probiotics group and full-term group ((371±13) vs. (338±12) and (411±32) μm, t=1.90, 1.15, both P>0.05). Conclusions: Premature birth could impact the lung alveolarization of piglets. The probiotics could improve the lung alveolarization of preterm minipigs by promoting the development of ileum 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
700 1 |a Yang, S  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Zhou, D  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Chen, T T  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Zhang, Y  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lu, J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wang, Q  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Shi, F  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Liu, Y  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Fu, H L  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Liu, H M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of pediatrics  |d 1960  |g 60(2022), 4 vom: 02. Apr., Seite 297-301  |w (DE-627)NLM136249191  |x 0578-1310  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:60  |g year:2022  |g number:4  |g day:02  |g month:04  |g pages:297-301 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20211231-01096  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_50 
912 |a GBV_ILN_61 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_72 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_130 
912 |a GBV_ILN_227 
912 |a GBV_ILN_244 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_294 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
912 |a GBV_ILN_665 
912 |a GBV_ILN_813 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 60  |j 2022  |e 4  |b 02  |c 04  |h 297-301