Characterization of the Ultrasound Localization Microscopy Resolution Limit in the Presence of Image Degradation
Ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) has been able to overcome the diffraction limit of ultrasound imaging. The resolution limit of ULM has been previously modeled using the Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB). While this model has been validated in a homogeneous medium, it estimates a resolution limi...
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control. - 1986. - 69(2022), 1 vom: 18. Jan., Seite 124-134 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
| Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2022
|
| Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control |
| Schlagworte: | Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
| Zusammenfassung: | Ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) has been able to overcome the diffraction limit of ultrasound imaging. The resolution limit of ULM has been previously modeled using the Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB). While this model has been validated in a homogeneous medium, it estimates a resolution limit, which has not yet been achieved in vivo. In this work, we investigated the effects of three sources of image degradation on the resolution limit of ULM. The Fullwave simulation tool was used to simulate acquisitions of transabdominal contrast-enhanced data at depth. The effects of reverberation clutter, trailing clutter, and phase aberration were studied. The resolution limit, in the presence of reverberation clutter alone, was empirically measured to be up to 39 times worse in the axial dimension and up to 2.1 times worse in the lateral dimension than the limit predicted by the CRLB. While reverberation clutter had an isotropic impact on the resolution, trailing clutter had a constant impact on both dimensions across all signal-to-trailing-clutter ratios (STCR). Phase aberration had a significant impact on the resolution limit over the studied analysis ranges. Phase aberration alone degraded the resolution limit up to 70 and 160 [Formula: see text] in the lateral and axial dimensions, respectively. These results illustrate the importance of phase aberration correction and clutter filtering in ULM postprocessing. The analysis results were demonstrated through the simulation of the ULM process applied to a cross-tube model that was degraded by each of the three aforementioned sources of degradation |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Date Completed 10.01.2022 Date Revised 26.08.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
| ISSN: | 1525-8955 |
| DOI: | 10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3112074 |