Assessing the Dynamic Versus Thermodynamic Origin of Climate Model Biases

Global climate models present systematic biases, among others, a tendency to overestimate hot and dry summers in midlatitude regions. Here we investigate the origin of such biases in the Community Earth System Model. To disentangle the contribution of dynamics and thermodynamics, we perform simulati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geophysical research letters. - 1984. - 45(2018), 16 vom: 28. Aug., Seite 8471-8479
1. Verfasser: Wehrli, Kathrin (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Guillod, Benoit P, Hauser, Mathias, Leclair, Matthieu, Seneviratne, Sonia I
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2018
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Geophysical research letters
Schlagworte:Journal Article Earth system models atmospheric nudging climate model biases dynamics versus thermodynamics global climate models systematic biases
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Global climate models present systematic biases, among others, a tendency to overestimate hot and dry summers in midlatitude regions. Here we investigate the origin of such biases in the Community Earth System Model. To disentangle the contribution of dynamics and thermodynamics, we perform simulations that include nudging of horizontal wind and compare them to simulations with a free atmosphere. Prescribing the observed large-scale circulation improves the modeled weather patterns as well as many related fields. However, the larger part of the temperature and precipitation biases of the free atmosphere configuration remains after nudging, in particular, for extremes. Our results suggest that thermodynamical processes, including land-atmosphere coupling and atmospheric parameterizations, drive the errors present in Community Earth System Model. Our result may apply to other climate models and highlight the importance of distinguishing thermodynamic and dynamic sources of biases in present-day global climate models
Beschreibung:Date Revised 11.10.2023
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
ISSN:0094-8276
DOI:10.1029/2018GL079220