Epiretinal membrane peeling after uncomplicated primary retinal detachment repair

Copyright 2014, SLACK Incorporated.

Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. - 2013. - 45(2014), 5 vom: 24. Sept., Seite 415-20
Auteur principal: Banker, Tanuj P (Auteur)
Autres auteurs: Godfrey, Kyle J, Godfrey, Kyle W, Reilly, Gayatri S, Weichel, Eric D
Format: Article en ligne
Langue:English
Publié: 2014
Accès à la collection:Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina
Sujets:Journal Article
LEADER 01000caa a22002652c 4500
001 NLM241266599
003 DE-627
005 20250217101440.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3928/23258160-20140815-01  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0804.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM241266599 
035 |a (NLM)25153659 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Banker, Tanuj P  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Epiretinal membrane peeling after uncomplicated primary retinal detachment repair 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 27.10.2015 
500 |a Date Revised 07.06.2016 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a ErratumIn: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016 Mar;47(3):206. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20160218-01 Godfrey, Kyle W [corrected to Godfrey, Kyle J]. - PMID 26985793 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a Copyright 2014, SLACK Incorporated. 
520 |a BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To identify rates and potential risk factors for epiretinal membrane (ERM) and for membrane peel (MP) after 23- or 25-gauge repair and to compare outcomes for eyes with ERM that underwent MP versus observation 
520 |a PATIENTS AND METHODS: Review of 587 eyes with ERM after retinal detachment repair. Patients who developed ERM either underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and MP or were observed 
520 |a RESULTS: Preoperatively, the PPV and MP group had a mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/100, compared to 20/40 for the observation group (P < .001). The PPV and MP group had a higher mean central subfield mean thickness (CSMT) (414 µm vs 281 µm). In the PPV and MP group, mean BCVA was 20/100 preoperatively and 20/50 postoperatively (P < .01). Mean CSMT was 397.5 µm preoperatively and 282.6 µm postoperatively (P < .01) 
520 |a CONCLUSION: ERM is common after 23- or 25-gauge PPV. PPV and MP can improve BCVA and decrease CSMT 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
700 1 |a Godfrey, Kyle J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Godfrey, Kyle W  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Reilly, Gayatri S  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Weichel, Eric D  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina  |d 2013  |g 45(2014), 5 vom: 24. Sept., Seite 415-20  |w (DE-627)NLM224956647  |x 2325-8179  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:45  |g year:2014  |g number:5  |g day:24  |g month:09  |g pages:415-20 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20140815-01  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_91 
912 |a GBV_ILN_130 
912 |a GBV_ILN_135 
912 |a GBV_ILN_136 
912 |a GBV_ILN_151 
912 |a GBV_ILN_181 
912 |a GBV_ILN_203 
912 |a GBV_ILN_217 
912 |a GBV_ILN_235 
912 |a GBV_ILN_289 
912 |a GBV_ILN_294 
912 |a GBV_ILN_297 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
912 |a GBV_ILN_352 
912 |a GBV_ILN_674 
912 |a GBV_ILN_676 
912 |a GBV_ILN_688 
912 |a GBV_ILN_698 
912 |a GBV_ILN_721 
912 |a GBV_ILN_737 
912 |a GBV_ILN_791 
912 |a GBV_ILN_812 
912 |a GBV_ILN_1127 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 45  |j 2014  |e 5  |b 24  |c 09  |h 415-20