Walking in a cube : novel metaphors for safely navigating large virtual environments in restricted real workspaces

Immersive spaces such as 4-sided displays with stereo viewing and high-quality tracking provide a very engaging and realistic virtual experience. However, walking is inherently limited by the restricted physical space, both due to the screens (limited translation) and the missing back screen (limite...

Description complète

Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics. - 1996. - 18(2012), 4 vom: 28. Apr., Seite 546-54
Auteur principal: Cirio, Gabriel (Auteur)
Autres auteurs: Vangorp, Peter, Chapoulie, Emmanuelle, Marchal, Maud, Lécuyer, Anatole, Drettakis, George
Format: Article en ligne
Langue:English
Publié: 2012
Accès à la collection:IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics
Sujets:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Description
Résumé:Immersive spaces such as 4-sided displays with stereo viewing and high-quality tracking provide a very engaging and realistic virtual experience. However, walking is inherently limited by the restricted physical space, both due to the screens (limited translation) and the missing back screen (limited rotation). In this paper, we propose three novel locomotion techniques that have three concurrent goals: keep the user safe from reaching the translational and rotational boundaries; increase the amount of real walking and finally, provide a more enjoyable and ecological interaction paradigm compared to traditional controller-based approaches. We notably introduce the "Virtual Companion", which uses a small bird to guide the user through VEs larger than the physical space. We evaluate the three new techniques through a user study with travel-to-target and path following tasks. The study provides insight into the relative strengths of each new technique for the three aforementioned goals. Specifically, if speed and accuracy are paramount, traditional controller interfaces augmented with our novel warning techniques may be more appropriate; if physical walking is more important, two of our paradigms (extended Magic Barrier Tape and Constrained Wand) should be preferred; last, fun and ecological criteria would favor the Virtual Companion
Description:Date Completed 16.07.2012
Date Revised 09.03.2012
published: Print
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:1941-0506
DOI:10.1109/TVCG.2012.60