The "lotus effect" explained : two reasons why two length scales of topography are important
Surfaces containing 4 x 8 x 40 microm staggered rhombus posts were hydrophobized using two methods. One, using a dimethyldichlorosilane reaction in the vapor phase, introduces a smooth modified layer, and the other, a solution reaction using methyltrichlorosilane, imparts a second (nanoscopic) lengt...
Veröffentlicht in: | Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids. - 1985. - 22(2006), 7 vom: 28. März, Seite 2966-7 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Weitere Verfasser: | |
Format: | Aufsatz |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
2006
|
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids |
Schlagworte: | Journal Article |
Zusammenfassung: | Surfaces containing 4 x 8 x 40 microm staggered rhombus posts were hydrophobized using two methods. One, using a dimethyldichlorosilane reaction in the vapor phase, introduces a smooth modified layer, and the other, a solution reaction using methyltrichlorosilane, imparts a second (nanoscopic) length scale of topography. The smooth modified surface exhibits contact angles of thetaA/thetaR = 176 degrees /156 degrees . Arguments are made that the pinning of the receding contact line by the post tops (with thetaA/thetaR = 104 degrees /103 degrees ) is responsible for the hysteresis. The second level of topography raises the contact angles of the post tops and the macroscopic sample to theta(A)/theta(R) = >176 degrees />176 degrees and eliminates hysteresis. The increase in Laplace pressure due to the increase in the advancing contact angle of the post tops is a second reason that two length scales of topography are important |
---|---|
Beschreibung: | Date Completed 06.06.2007 Date Revised 21.03.2006 published: Print Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
ISSN: | 1520-5827 |