On Noncoercive Establishment
In this essay, I raise the question of whether some degree of noncoercive state support for religious conceptions (broadly understood) should be left to the majoritarian branch ofgovernment. I argue that the reason not to do so is that such state support would alienate many citizens. However to take...
Veröffentlicht in: | Political Theory. - SAGE Publications. - 33(2005), 6, Seite 812-839 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
2005
|
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Political Theory |
Schlagworte: | Establishment Religion Democracy Liberalism Political science Law Social sciences Behavioral sciences |
Zusammenfassung: | In this essay, I raise the question of whether some degree of noncoercive state support for religious conceptions (broadly understood) should be left to the majoritarian branch ofgovernment. I argue that the reason not to do so is that such state support would alienate many citizens. However to take this as a sufficient reason to constrain the majoritarian branch is to accept the thesis that not being alienated from one's polity is a significant part of the human good. Those who would prohibit even a small amount of noncoercive support of religious conceptions must appeal either to pragmatic considerations (the worry that noncoercive will lead to coercive support, i.e., to tyranny) or to a conception of the good that puts great value on the agent's sense of connectedness to the polity. And the latter is something that reasonable citizens in a modern democracy could reasonably reject. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 00905917 |