Hospital Ownership and Financial Performance: What Explains the Different Findings in the Empirical Literature?
This study applies meta-analytic methods to conduct a quantitative review of the empirical literature on hospital ownership since 1990. We examine four financial outcomes across 40 studies: cost, revenue, profit margin, and efficiency. We find that variation in the magnitudes of ownership effects ca...
| Veröffentlicht in: | Inquiry. - SAGE Publications, 1963. - 44(2007), 1, Seite 41-68 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Weitere Verfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2007
|
| Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Inquiry |
| Schlagworte: | Health sciences Economics Business Mathematics Behavioral sciences |
| Zusammenfassung: | This study applies meta-analytic methods to conduct a quantitative review of the empirical literature on hospital ownership since 1990. We examine four financial outcomes across 40 studies: cost, revenue, profit margin, and efficiency. We find that variation in the magnitudes of ownership effects can be explained by a study's research focus and methodology. Studies using empirical methods that control for few confounding factors tend to find larger differences between for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals than studies that control for a wider range of confounding factors. Functional form and sample size also matter. Failure to apply log transformation to highly skewed expenditure data yields misleadingly large estimated differences between for-profits and not-for-profits. Studies with fewer than 200 observations also produce larger point estimates and wide confidence intervals. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 19457243 |