After Secularization?

The study of secularization appears to be entering a new phase. Supplyside theories that focus exclusively on religious participation and membership seem too one-dimensional. But classical theories of secularization contain generalized and teleological premises that are at odds with the complexities...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annual Review of Sociology. - Annual Reviews, 1975. - 34(2008) vom: Jan., Seite 55-85
1. Verfasser: Gorski, Philip S. (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Altinordu, Ateş
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2008
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Annual Review of Sociology
Schlagworte:church attendance de-Christianization democracy differentiation Islamism postsecular religious economies sociology of religion Political science Religion Behavioral sciences
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The study of secularization appears to be entering a new phase. Supplyside theories that focus exclusively on religious participation and membership seem too one-dimensional. But classical theories of secularization contain generalized and teleological premises that are at odds with the complexities of empirical reality and the historical record. This review seeks to map a new way forward and identify key obstacles and goals. It begins by retracing the development of secularization theory within sociology and the genealogy of the secularization concept within presociological discourse. It then reviews what is and is not known about secularization in the West, noting the limitations of the data and biases in research. The article further argues for comparative and historical approaches that incorporate non-Christian religions and non-Western regions. The social scientific literature that critically reassesses the relationship between diverse religious movements, secularisms, and liberal democracies presents new questions for future research. We stress the importance of theoretical approaches that move beyond the deeply entrenched secularist and religious assumptions and propose general guidelines for future research on the varieties of secularity.
ISSN:15452115